Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;65(2):150-3.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80130-5. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

Maxillary Expansion in Cleft Lip and Palate using Quad Helix and Rapid Palatal Expansion Screw

Affiliations

Maxillary Expansion in Cleft Lip and Palate using Quad Helix and Rapid Palatal Expansion Screw

M R Vasant et al. Med J Armed Forces India. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Management of patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) includes orthodontic treatment prior to bone grafting. Palatal expansion is done using slow or rapid palatal expansions (RPE). Controversy still exists regarding choice of expansion appliances used. This study was conducted to find out whether the Quad helix appliance represents a reasonable alternative to using conventional rapid maxillary expansion appliance among cleft lip and palate patients.

Methods: Twenty cleft lip and palate patients had orthodontic study models taken prior to expansion and at the end of expansion. There pre and post treatment study models were analyzed for changes in intermolar width, molar tipping and molar rotation.

Result: The difference in molar tipping, increase in intercanine and molar width between slow palatal expansion (SPE) and rapid palatal expansion (RPE) group was not statistically significant. A difference between the two groups was found in the ability to rotate molars.

Conclusion: The clinical findings suggest that maxillary expansion using the Quad helix appliance represents a reasonable alternative to using conventional rapid maxillary expansion appliances among cleft patients.

Keywords: Cleft lip palate; Expansion Introduction; Orthodontics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Quad helix appliance
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Rapid palatal expansion appliance
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Evaluation of molar rotation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Evaluation of molar tipping
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Maxillary arch before expansion
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Maxillary arch after expansion

References

    1. Geran RG, McNamara JA, Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Shapiro LM. A prospective long-term study on the effects of rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:631–640. - PubMed
    1. McNally MR, Spary DJ, Rock WP. A randomized controlled trial comparing the quadhelix and the expansion arch for the correction of crossbite. Journal of Orthodontics. 2005;32:29–35. - PubMed
    1. Lilja J, Kalaaji A, Friede H, Elander A. Combined bone grafting and delayed closure of the hard palate in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: facilitation of lateral incisor eruption and evaluation of indicators for timing of the procedure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:98–105. - PubMed
    1. Levitt T, Long RE, Jr, Trotman CA. Maxillary growth in patients with clefts following secondary alveolar bone grafting. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36:398–406. - PubMed
    1. Tindlund RS, Rygh P. Soft-tissue profile changes during widening and protraction of the maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate compared with normal growth and development. Cleft Palate Caiofac J. 1993;30:454–468. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources