Klinefelter syndrome and fertility: sperm preservation should not be offered to children with Klinefelter syndrome
- PMID: 27412247
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew179
Klinefelter syndrome and fertility: sperm preservation should not be offered to children with Klinefelter syndrome
Abstract
Study question: Should fertility preservation be offered to children with Klinefelter syndrome (KS)?
Summary answer: Current evidence shows that fertility preservation should not be offered to adolescents with KS younger than 16 years because of lower retrieval rates for germ cells by testicular sperm extraction (TESE) compared with retrieval rates for adolescents and adults between 16 and 30 years.
What is known already: KS, the most common chromosomal disorder in men leading to non-obstructive azoospermia, is caused by the presence of at least one additional X chromosome. The onset of puberty in adolescents with KS leads to progressive degeneration of the testicular environment. The impact of the subsequent tissue degeneration on fertility potential of patients with KS is unknown, but in previous literature it has been suggested that fertility preservation should be started in adolescents as early as possible. However spermatozoa can be found by TESE in about 50% of adults with KS despite severe testicular degeneration. This review discusses the current evidence for fertility preservation in children and adolescents and possible prognostic markers for fertility treatment in KS.
Study design, size, duration: An extensive literature search was conducted, searching Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl and Web of Science from origin until April 2016 for 'Klinefelter syndrome' and 'fertility' and various synonyms. Titles and abstracts have been scanned manually by the authors for eligibility.
Participants/materials, setting, methods: In total 76 studies were found to be eligible for inclusion in this review. Information from the papers was extracted separately by two authors.
Main results and the role of chance: Various studies have shown that pre-pubertal children with KS already have a reduced number of germ cells despite a normal hormonal profile during childhood. The presence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate of adolescents with KS is extremely rare. Using TESE, the retrieval rates of spermatozoa for adolescents younger than 16 years old are much lower (0-20%) compared with those for adolescents and young adults between 16 and 30 years old (40-70%). Although spermatogonia can be found by TESE in about half of the peri-pubertal adolescents, there are currently no clinically functional techniques for their future use. Children and adolescents need to be informed that early fertility preservation before the age of 16 cannot guarantee fertility later in life and may even reduce the chances for offspring by removing functional immature germ cells which may possibly develop into spermatozoa after puberty. Furthermore, except for the age of patients with KS, there are no identified factors that can reliably be used as a predictive marker for fertility preservation.
Limitations, reasons for caution: Most of the evidence presented in this review is based on studies including a small number of adolescents with KS. Therefore, the studies may have been underpowered to detect clinically significant differences for their various outcomes, especially for potential predictive factors for fertility preservation, such as hormone levels. Furthermore, the population of patients with KS diagnosed during childhood might be different from the adult population with KS where the diagnosis is based on infertility. Results based on comparisons between the two groups must be interpreted with caution.
Wider implications of the findings: Despite the limitations, this review summarizes the current evidence for managing fertility preservation in patients with KS to provide optimal health care.
Study funding/competing interests: There was no funding for this study. S.F., Y.H., K.D., W.L.M.N., D.S., H.L.C.-v.d.G. and L.R. declare to have no conflicts of interests. D.D.M.B. reports grants from Merck Serono, grants from Ferring and grants from MSD, outside the submitted work. K.F. reports personal fees from MSD (commercial sponsor), personal fees from Ferring (commercial sponsor), grants from Merck-Serono (commercial sponsor), grants from Ferring (commercial sponsor) and grants from MSD (commercial sponsor), outside the submitted work.
Keywords: Klinefelter syndrome; TESE; adolescent; fertility preservation; sperm retrieval.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Re: Klinefelter Syndrome and Fertility: Sperm Preservation Should Not be Offered to Children with Klinefelter Syndrome.J Urol. 2017 May;197(5):1335. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.051. Epub 2017 Feb 21. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 29539946 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
When does germ cell loss and fibrosis occur in patients with Klinefelter syndrome?Hum Reprod. 2018 Jun 1;33(6):1009-1022. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey094. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 29684126
-
The feasibility of fertility preservation in adolescents with Klinefelter syndrome.Hum Reprod. 2013 Jun;28(6):1468-79. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det084. Epub 2013 Mar 28. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23539613
-
Birth of 16 healthy children after ICSI in cases of nonmosaic Klinefelter syndrome.Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1155-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det046. Epub 2013 Mar 14. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23493114
-
Age-related presence of spermatogonia in patients with Klinefelter syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):58-72. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz038. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 31822886
-
Testicular biopsy and cryopreservation for fertility preservation of prepubertal boys with Klinefelter syndrome: a pro/con debate.Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.011. Epub 2015 Dec 31. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 26748226 Review.
Cited by
-
ART strategies in Klinefelter syndrome.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Sep;37(9):2053-2079. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01818-2. Epub 2020 Jun 20. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020. PMID: 32562095 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Editorial: Fertility in Klinefelter Syndrome: The Need for a Multidisciplinary Approach.Front Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 24;3:792479. doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.792479. eCollection 2021. Front Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 36304013 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparison of Effects of Chorionic Gonadotropin Alfa and Anastrozole on Sperm Retrieval Rate in Patients with Non-Mosaic Klinefelter Syndrome Following Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 7;61(3):467. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030467. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40142278 Free PMC article.
-
Sperm extraction in nonmosaic Klinefelter syndrome patients: A case series and literature review of sperm extraction in Klinefelter syndrome patients.Urol Ann. 2024 Jul-Sep;16(3):241-246. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_55_23. Epub 2024 Jul 3. Urol Ann. 2024. PMID: 39290228 Free PMC article.
-
The Klinefelter Syndrome and Testicular Sperm Retrieval Outcomes.Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 4;14(3):647. doi: 10.3390/genes14030647. Genes (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36980920 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous