Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov;21(11):1396-1409.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0066. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

The Prevalence and Prognostic Value of Low Muscle Mass in Cancer Patients: A Review of the Literature

Affiliations
Review

The Prevalence and Prognostic Value of Low Muscle Mass in Cancer Patients: A Review of the Literature

Hánah N Rier et al. Oncologist. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

: In several diseases, low muscle mass has been revealed as an unfavorable prognostic factor for outcome. Whether this holds true in patients with solid malignancies as well has increasingly been explored recently. However, this research field is severely hampered by a lack of consensus on how to determine muscle mass in cancer patients and on the definition of low muscle mass. Consequently, the prevalence of low muscle mass varies widely across several studies. Nevertheless, most studies show that, in patients with solid malignancies, low muscle mass is associated with a poor outcome. In the future, more research is needed to get better insight into the best method to determine muscle mass, the exact prognostic value of low muscle mass in diverse tumor types and stages, pathophysiology of low muscle mass in patients with cancer, and ways to intervene and improve muscle mass in patients. This review addresses the current literature on the importance of muscle mass in cancer patients and the methods of muscle measurement.

Implications for practice: An increasing number of studies underline the clinical value of low muscle mass as a prognostic factor for adverse outcomes in cancer patients. However, studies show large heterogeneity because of the lack of a standardized approach to measure muscle mass and the lack of reference populations. As a result, the interpretation of data and further progress are severely hampered, hindering the implementation of muscle measurement in oncological care. This review summarizes the methods of diagnosing low muscle mass in cancer patients, the difference between underlying syndromes such as sarcopenia and cachexia, and the association with clinical outcomes described so far.

Keywords: Cancer; Chemotherapy; Low muscle mass; Sarcopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Diagnostic algorithm for sarcopenia according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People [17]. aLow gait speed, ≤0.8 m/second; normal gait speed, >0.8 m/second.

References

    1. Kitamura I, Koda M, Otsuka R, et al. Six-year longitudinal changes in body composition of middle-aged and elderly Japanese: Age and sex differences in appendicular skeletal muscle mass. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014;14:354–361. - PubMed
    1. Hughes VA, Frontera WR, Wood M, et al. Longitudinal muscle strength changes in older adults: Influence of muscle mass, physical activity, and health. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:B209–B217. - PubMed
    1. Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB, et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: The health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:1059–1064. - PubMed
    1. Kalafateli M, Konstantakis C, Thomopoulos K, et al. Impact of muscle wasting on survival in patients with liver cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:7357–7361. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkins JL, Whincup PH, Morris RW, et al. Sarcopenic obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: A population-based cohort study of older men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62:253–260. - PMC - PubMed