Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep;42(5):1090-5.
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw096. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

Engaging Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Neurocircuitry in Search of Meaning

Affiliations
Review

Engaging Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Neurocircuitry in Search of Meaning

Greg I Elmer et al. Schizophr Bull. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative was implemented to reorient the approach to mental health research from one focused on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) nosology to one oriented to psychological constructs constrained by neurocircuitry and molecular entities. The initiative has generated significant discussion and valuable reflection on the moorings of psychiatric research. The purpose of this article is to illustrate how a basic or clinical investigator can engage RDoC to explore the neurobiological underpinnings of psychopathology and how a research question can be formulated in RDoC's framework. We utilize a brain region with significant growing interest, the habenula, as an example for probing RDoC's utility. Opportunities to enhance neurocircuitry-psychological construct associations and problems associated with neuronal populations that enable bidirectional circuitry influence are discussed. The exercise reveals areas for further development that could move RDoC from a promising research idea to a successfully engaged foundation for catalyzing clinically relevant discoveries.

Keywords: DSM; RMTg; endophenotype; habenula; psychiatric diagnosis; translational.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
RDoC envisions sets of psychological constructs organized into larger associated domains. Individual constructs are thought to function along a continuum from normal to abnormal. The balance of construct functionality contributes to the overall mental constitution of the individual. RDoC, Research Domain Criteria.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Example informatics diagram based upon anatomical connections with the Hb. Clicking the region of interest (LHb) would expand afferent and efferent portions of the circuit along with associated construct annotations. Hb, habenula; BNST, bed nucleus solitarus tract; LH, lateral hypothalamus; NAcc, nucleus accumbens core; PAG, periaqueductal gray; RMTg, rostral medial tegmentum; SC, superior colliculus; VP, ventral pallidum; VTA, ventral tegmental area.

References

    1. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:748–751. - PubMed
    1. Insel TR, Cuthbert BN. Endophenotypes: bridging genomic complexity and disorder heterogeneity. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66:988–989. - PubMed
    1. Kozak MJ, Cuthbert BN. The NIMH research domain criteria initiative: background, issues, and pragmatics. Psychophysiology. 2016;53:286–297. - PubMed
    1. Iacono WG. Achieving success with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): going beyond the matrix. Psychophysiology. 2016;53:308–311. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patrick CJ, Hajcak G. RDoC: translating promise into progress. Psychophysiology. 2016;53:415–424. - PubMed

Publication types