Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 1;2(11):1421-1426.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1861.

Determinants of Patient-Oncologist Prognostic Discordance in Advanced Cancer

Affiliations

Determinants of Patient-Oncologist Prognostic Discordance in Advanced Cancer

Robert Gramling et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Patients with advanced cancer often report expectations for survival that differ from their oncologists' expectations. Whether patients know that their survival expectations differ from those of their oncologists remains unknown. This distinction is important because knowingly expressing differences of opinion is important for shared decision making, whereas patients not knowing that their understanding differs from that of their treating physician is a potential marker of inadequate communication.

Objective: To describe the prevalence, distribution, and proportion of prognostic discordance that is due to patients' knowingly vs unknowingly expressing an opinion that differs from that of their oncologist.

Design, setting, and participants: Cross-sectional study conducted at academic and community oncology practices in Rochester, New York, and Sacramento, California. The sample comprises 236 patients with advanced cancer and their 38 oncologists who participated in a randomized trial of an intervention to improve clinical communication. Participants were enrolled from August 2012 to June 2014 and followed up until October 2015.

Main outcomes and measures: We ascertained discordance by comparing patient and oncologist ratings of 2-year survival probability. For discordant pairs, we determined whether patients knew that their opinions differed from those of their oncologists by asking the patients to report how they believed their oncologists rated their 2-year survival.

Results: Among the 236 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.4] years; 54% female), 161 patient-oncologist survival prognosis ratings (68%; 95% CI, 62%-75%) were discordant. Discordance was substantially more common among nonwhite patients compared with white patients (95% [95% CI, 86%-100%] vs 65% [95% CI, 58%-73%], respectively; P = .03). Among 161 discordant patients, 144 (89%) did not know that their opinions differed from that of their oncologists and nearly all of them (155 of 161 [96%]) were more optimistic than their oncologists.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, patient-oncologist discordance about survival prognosis was common and patients rarely knew that their opinions differed from those of their oncologists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

References

    1. Bernacki RE, Block SD American College of Physicians High Value Care Task Force. Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1994–2003. - PubMed
    1. Gramling R, Sanders M, Ladwig S, Norton SA, Epstein R, Alexander SC. Goal communication in palliative care decision-making consultations. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;50(5):701–706. - PubMed
    1. Committee on Approaching Death: Addressing Key End-of-Life Issues, Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2014. - PubMed
    1. Gramling R, Carroll T, Epstein R. Prognostication in advanced illness. In: Goldstein N, Morrison RS, editors. Evidence-Based Practice of Palliative Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2013.
    1. Weeks JC, Cook EF, O’Day SJ, et al. Relationship between cancer patients’ predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA. 1998;279(21):1709–1714. - PubMed