A randomized phase III study of carfilzomib vs low-dose corticosteroids with optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (FOCUS)
- PMID: 27416912
- PMCID: PMC5220126
- DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.176
A randomized phase III study of carfilzomib vs low-dose corticosteroids with optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (FOCUS)
Abstract
This randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter study compared carfilzomib monotherapy against low-dose corticosteroids and optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients were randomized (1:1) to receive carfilzomib (10-min intravenous infusion; 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 27 mg/m2 thereafter) or a control regimen of low-dose corticosteroids (84 mg of dexamethasone or equivalent corticosteroid) with optional cyclophosphamide (1400 mg) for 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Three-hundred and fifteen patients were randomized to carfilzomib (n=157) or control (n=158). Both groups had a median of five prior regimens. In the control group, 95% of patients received cyclophosphamide. Median OS was 10.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4-14.4) vs 10.0 months (95% CI 7.7-12.0) with carfilzomib vs control (hazard ratio=0.975; 95% CI 0.760-1.249; P=0.4172). Progression-free survival was similar between groups; overall response rate was higher with carfilzomib (19.1 vs 11.4%). The most common grade ⩾3 adverse events were anemia (25.5 vs 30.7%), thrombocytopenia (24.2 vs 22.2%) and neutropenia (7.6 vs 12.4%) with carfilzomib vs control. Median OS for single-agent carfilzomib was similar to that for an active doublet control regimen in heavily pretreated RRMM patients.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01302392.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Hájek reports funding from Celgene, Janssen and Merck outside of the submitted work; Dr Masszi has nothing to disclose; Dr Petrucci reports receiving personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, and BMS outside the submitted work; Dr Palumbo reports receiving personal fees from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab A/S, Janssen-Cilag, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Aventis, Celgene and Array BioPharma outside the submitted work; Dr Rosiñol reports personal fees from Onyx during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Janssen, and Celgene outside the submitted work; Dr Nagler reports funding from Onyx outside the submitted work; Dr Yong has nothing to disclose; Dr Oriol reports other from Celgene, Jansen and Novartis outside the submitted work; Dr Minarik has nothing to disclose; Dr Pour has nothing to disclose; Dr Dimopoulos reports personal fees from Onyx and Celgene outside the submitted work; Dr Maisnar reports funding from Celgene, Janssen, and Amgen outside the submitted work; Dr Rossi has nothing to disclose; Dr Kasparu has nothing to disclose; Dr Droogenbroeck has nothing to disclose; Dr Ben-Yehuda has nothing to disclose; Dr Hardan has nothing to disclose; Dr Jenner received honoraria from Amgen/Onyx outside the submitted work; Dr Calbecka has nothing to disclose; Dr David has nothing to disclose; Dr de la Rubia has nothing to disclose; Dr Drach has nothing to disclose; Dr Gasztonyi has nothing to disclose; Dr Górnik has nothing to disclose; Dr Leleu reports funding from Celgene, Janssen, Leopharma, Amgen, Novartis, and Sanofi outside the submitted work; Dr Munder has nothing to disclose; Dr Offidani reports other from Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Novartis, and Mundipharma outside the submitted work; Dr Zojer received honoraria from Janssen-Cilag and Mundipharma; Dr Chang is employed by, and owns stock in, Onyx; Dr Rajangam is employed by, and owns stock in, Onyx; Dr San Miguel reports funding from Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Janssen, BMS, and MSD outside the submitted work; and Dr Ludwig reports grants from Takeda, personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Bristol Meyers, Amgen and Onyx outside the submitted work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1327-1337. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8. Epub 2017 Aug 23. Lancet Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28843768 Clinical Trial.
-
Once weekly versus twice weekly carfilzomib dosing in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (A.R.R.O.W.): interim analysis results of a randomised, phase 3 study.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):953-964. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30354-1. Epub 2018 Jun 1. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29866475 Clinical Trial.
-
Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):27-38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00464-7. Epub 2015 Dec 5. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26671818 Clinical Trial.
-
Carfilzomib: a second-generation proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jan;47(1):56-62. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R561. Epub 2013 Jan 8. Ann Pharmacother. 2013. PMID: 23300152 Review.
-
Carfilzomib: in relapsed, or relapsed and refractory, multiple myeloma.Drugs. 2012 Oct 22;72(15):2023-32. doi: 10.2165/11209010-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2012. PMID: 22994535 Review.
Cited by
-
The renal damage and mechanisms relevant to antitumoral drugs.Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 12;13:1331671. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1331671. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 38148845 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of cardiovascular risk in patients with multiple myeloma.Blood Cancer J. 2019 Feb 26;9(3):26. doi: 10.1038/s41408-019-0183-y. Blood Cancer J. 2019. PMID: 30808934 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nephrotoxicity in cancer treatment: An overview.World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 24;11(4):190-204. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i4.190. World J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32355641 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Carfilzomib-Associated Cardiovascular Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 8;4(3):e174519. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4519. Epub 2018 Mar 8. JAMA Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29285538 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Trial in a Dish: Using Patient-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Identify Risks of Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity.Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021 Mar;41(3):1019-1031. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.314695. Epub 2021 Jan 21. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021. PMID: 33472401 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kumar SK, Therneau TM, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Rajkumar SV et al. Clinical course of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79: 867–874. - PubMed
-
- Durie BG, Moreau P, Sonneveld P, Morgan GJ, Lahuerta JJ, Beksac M et al. Regional differences in the treatment approaches for relapsed multiple myeloma: an IMF study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 15s (abstract 8095).
-
- Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster M, Irwin D, Stadtmauer E, Facon T et al. Extended follow-up of a phase 3 trial in relapsed multiple myeloma: final time-to-event results of the APEX trial. Blood 2007; 110: 3557–3560. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical