Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Jan;31(1):107-114.
doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.176. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

A randomized phase III study of carfilzomib vs low-dose corticosteroids with optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (FOCUS)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized phase III study of carfilzomib vs low-dose corticosteroids with optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (FOCUS)

R Hájek et al. Leukemia. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

This randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter study compared carfilzomib monotherapy against low-dose corticosteroids and optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients were randomized (1:1) to receive carfilzomib (10-min intravenous infusion; 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 27 mg/m2 thereafter) or a control regimen of low-dose corticosteroids (84 mg of dexamethasone or equivalent corticosteroid) with optional cyclophosphamide (1400 mg) for 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Three-hundred and fifteen patients were randomized to carfilzomib (n=157) or control (n=158). Both groups had a median of five prior regimens. In the control group, 95% of patients received cyclophosphamide. Median OS was 10.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4-14.4) vs 10.0 months (95% CI 7.7-12.0) with carfilzomib vs control (hazard ratio=0.975; 95% CI 0.760-1.249; P=0.4172). Progression-free survival was similar between groups; overall response rate was higher with carfilzomib (19.1 vs 11.4%). The most common grade ⩾3 adverse events were anemia (25.5 vs 30.7%), thrombocytopenia (24.2 vs 22.2%) and neutropenia (7.6 vs 12.4%) with carfilzomib vs control. Median OS for single-agent carfilzomib was similar to that for an active doublet control regimen in heavily pretreated RRMM patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01302392.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Hájek reports funding from Celgene, Janssen and Merck outside of the submitted work; Dr Masszi has nothing to disclose; Dr Petrucci reports receiving personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, and BMS outside the submitted work; Dr Palumbo reports receiving personal fees from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab A/S, Janssen-Cilag, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Aventis, Celgene and Array BioPharma outside the submitted work; Dr Rosiñol reports personal fees from Onyx during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Janssen, and Celgene outside the submitted work; Dr Nagler reports funding from Onyx outside the submitted work; Dr Yong has nothing to disclose; Dr Oriol reports other from Celgene, Jansen and Novartis outside the submitted work; Dr Minarik has nothing to disclose; Dr Pour has nothing to disclose; Dr Dimopoulos reports personal fees from Onyx and Celgene outside the submitted work; Dr Maisnar reports funding from Celgene, Janssen, and Amgen outside the submitted work; Dr Rossi has nothing to disclose; Dr Kasparu has nothing to disclose; Dr Droogenbroeck has nothing to disclose; Dr Ben-Yehuda has nothing to disclose; Dr Hardan has nothing to disclose; Dr Jenner received honoraria from Amgen/Onyx outside the submitted work; Dr Calbecka has nothing to disclose; Dr David has nothing to disclose; Dr de la Rubia has nothing to disclose; Dr Drach has nothing to disclose; Dr Gasztonyi has nothing to disclose; Dr Górnik has nothing to disclose; Dr Leleu reports funding from Celgene, Janssen, Leopharma, Amgen, Novartis, and Sanofi outside the submitted work; Dr Munder has nothing to disclose; Dr Offidani reports other from Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Novartis, and Mundipharma outside the submitted work; Dr Zojer received honoraria from Janssen-Cilag and Mundipharma; Dr Chang is employed by, and owns stock in, Onyx; Dr Rajangam is employed by, and owns stock in, Onyx; Dr San Miguel reports funding from Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Janssen, BMS, and MSD outside the submitted work; and Dr Ludwig reports grants from Takeda, personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Bristol Meyers, Amgen and Onyx outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Random assignment and follow-up.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan−Meier estimates of (a) OS and (b) PFS.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 2008; 111: 2516–2520. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, Therneau TM, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Rajkumar SV et al. Clinical course of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79: 867–874. - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ, Morgan G, Richardson PG, Crowley J et al. Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter international myeloma working group study. Leukemia 2012; 26: 149–157. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Durie BG, Moreau P, Sonneveld P, Morgan GJ, Lahuerta JJ, Beksac M et al. Regional differences in the treatment approaches for relapsed multiple myeloma: an IMF study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 15s (abstract 8095).
    1. Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster M, Irwin D, Stadtmauer E, Facon T et al. Extended follow-up of a phase 3 trial in relapsed multiple myeloma: final time-to-event results of the APEX trial. Blood 2007; 110: 3557–3560. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data