Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 15:16:239.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0958-7.

Clinical assessment of bipolar depression: validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS)

Young-Eun Jung  1 , Moon-Doo Kim  2 , Won-Myong Bahk  3 , Young Sup Woo  4 , Jonghun Lee  5 , Sae-Heon Jang  6 , Seunghee Won  7 , Kyung Joon Min  8 , Sangkeun Chung  9 , Young-Joon Kwon  10 , Duk-In Jon  11 , Kwanghun Lee  12 , Bo-Hyun Yoon  13
Affiliations

Clinical assessment of bipolar depression: validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS)

Young-Eun Jung et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: The Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS) is a scale for assessment of the clinical characteristics of bipolar depression. The primary aims of this study were to describe the development of the Korean version of the BDRS (K-BDRS) and to establish more firmly its psychometric properties in terms of reliability and validity.

Methods: The study included 141 patients (62 male and 79 female) who had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, were currently experiencing symptoms of depression, and were interviewed using the K-BDRS. Other measures included the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS), the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Additionally, the internal consistency, concurrent validity, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability of the K-BDRS were evaluated.

Results: The Cronbach's α-coefficient for the K-BDRS was 0.866, the K-BDRS exhibited strong correlations with the HAMD (r = 0.788) and MADRS (r = 0.877), and the mixed symptoms score of the K-BDRS was significantly correlated with the YMRS (r = 0.611). An exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors that corresponded to psychological depressive symptoms, somatic depressive symptoms, and mixed symptoms.

Conclusions: The present findings suggest that the K-BDRS has good psychometric properties and is a valid and reliable tool for assessing depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder.

Keywords: BDRS; Bipolar depression; Bipolar disorder; Korean; Reliability; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ, Endicott JN, Maser J, Solomon DA, et al. The long-term natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar I disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:530–7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.6.530. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ, Coryell W, Endicott J, Maser JD, et al. A prospective investigation of the natural history of the long-term weekly symptomatic status of bipolar II disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:261–9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.3.261. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldberg JF, Harrow M, Whiteside JE. Risk for bipolar illness in patients initially hospitalized for unipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:1265–70. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.8.1265. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kamat SA, Rajagopalan K, Pethick N, Willey V, Bullano M, Hassan M. Prevalence and humanistic impact of potential misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder among patients with major depressive disorder in a commercially insured population. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008;14:631–42. - PubMed
    1. Gan Z, Diao F, Wei Q, Wu X, Cheng M, Guan N, et al. A predictive model for diagnosing bipolar disorder based on the clinical characteristics of major depressive episodes in Chinese population. J Affect Disord. 2011;134:119–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.054. - DOI - PubMed