Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 15:11:93.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0462-y.

The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels

Ignacio Neumann  1   2 , Romina Brignardello-Petersen  1   3 , Wojtek Wiercioch  1 , Alonso Carrasco-Labra  1   3 , Carlos Cuello  1 , Elie Akl  4 , Reem A Mustafa  1   5 , Waleed Al-Hazzani  1 , Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta  1   6 , Maria Ximena Rojas  7 , Maicon Falavigna  8 , Nancy Santesso  1 , Jan Brozek  1   9 , Alfonso Iorio  1 , Pablo Alonso-Coello  1   10 , Holger J Schünemann  11   12
Affiliations

The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels

Ignacio Neumann et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Judgments underlying guideline recommendations are seldom recorded and presented in a systematic fashion. The GRADE Evidence-to-Decision Framework (EtD) offers a transparent way to record and report guideline developers' judgments. In this paper, we report the experiences with the EtD frameworks in 15 real guideline panels.

Methods: Following the guideline panel meetings, we asked methodologists participating in the panel to provide feedback regarding the EtD framework. They were instructed to consider their own experience and the feedback collected from the rest of the panel. Two investigators independently summarized the responses and jointly interpreted the data using pre-specified domains as coding system. We asked methodologists to review the results and provide further input to improve the structure of the EtDs iteratively.

Results: The EtD framework was well received, and the comments were generally positive. Methodologists felt that in a real guideline panel, the EtD framework helps structuring a complex process through relatively simple steps in an explicit and transparent way. However, some sections (e.g., "values and preferences" and "balance between benefits and harms") required further development and clarification that were considered in the current version of the EtD framework.

Conclusions: The use of an EtD framework in guideline development offers a structured and explicit way to record and report the judgments and discussion of guideline panels during the formulation of recommendations. In addition, it facilitates the formulation of recommendations, assessment of their strength, and identifying gaps in research.

Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines; Evidence to decisions framework; GRADE; GRADEpro; Recommendations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7182):527–530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Shekelle P, Schunemann HJ, Woolf S. Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest. Implemen Sci. 2012;7:60. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-60. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shekelle P, Woolf S, Grimshaw JM, Schunemann HJ, Eccles MP. Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development. Implemen Sci. 2012;7:62. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-62. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woolf S, Schunemann HJ, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Shekelle P. Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implemen Sci. 2012;7:61. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-61. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, Fervers B, Graham ID, Grimshaw J, Hanna SE, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(12):1308–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources