Doppler echocardiographic measurement of low velocity motion of the left ventricular posterior wall
- PMID: 2741815
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90655-3
Doppler echocardiographic measurement of low velocity motion of the left ventricular posterior wall
Abstract
A new noninvasive method using pulsed Doppler echocardiography was developed to assess left ventricular (LV) posterior wall motion dynamics. Seventeen normal subjects and 23 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were prospectively studied. The sample volume was placed within the LV posterior wall endocardium just apical to the mitral valve sulcus using a posteriorly angulated low parasternal view. The wall filter was set at 100 Hz to record the low velocities of the LV posterior wall motion. The Doppler signal was morphologically similar to the rate of change of the LV posterior wall endocardium excursion obtained by a digitized M-mode echocardiogram, and showed 3 major waves: a systolic wave (S), an early diastolic wave (E) and a late diastolic wave (A). The peak velocities of LV posterior wall endocardium excursion were also determined by M-mode echocardiographic technique. We found a significant linear correlation between peak E-wave velocity and M-mode peak diastolic endocardial velocity (r = 0.90, p less than 0.001) and between peak S-wave velocity and M-mode peak systolic endocardial velocity (r = 0.81, p less than 0.001). M-mode peak systolic endocardial velocity showed an important overlap between control subjects and patients with normal and patients with abnormal LV posterior wall motion on the angiogram. In contrast, peak S-wave velocity was a better discriminator, and a peak S-wave velocity less than 7.5 cm/s was associated with abnormal LV posterior wall motion with an 83% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 95% accuracy. In patients with coronary artery disease but normal systolic LV posterior wall motion and normal global systolic LV function, peak S-wave velocity was not different when compared to control subjects. Peak E-wave velocity and E/A were significantly lower than in control subjects (p less than 0.01) and peak A-wave velocity was greater (p less than 0.01). In conclusion, these data suggest that pulsed Doppler echocardiography can be used for the direct analysis of LV posterior wall instantaneous low velocities and appears to be more informative than M-mode technique for systolic measurements. Thus, detection of abnormal LV posterior wall diastolic motion by pulsed Doppler echocardiography may, upon additional confirmation, be used as a new noninvasive method to gain insight into global LV diastolic performance.
Comment in
-
Doppler measurement of posterior left ventricular wall velocity.Am J Cardiol. 1990 Apr 15;65(15):1047. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)91018-2. Am J Cardiol. 1990. PMID: 2327346 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Difference in systolic motion velocity of the left ventricular posterior wall in patients with asymmetric septal hypertrophy and prior anteroseptal myocardial infarction. Evaluation by pulsed tissue Doppler imaging.Jpn Heart J. 1998 Mar;39(2):163-72. doi: 10.1536/ihj.39.163. Jpn Heart J. 1998. PMID: 9687825
-
The impact of hypertension and hypertension-related left ventricle hypertrophy on right ventricle function.Echocardiography. 2007 Apr;24(4):374-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00419.x. Echocardiography. 2007. PMID: 17381646
-
Clinical in vivo calibration of pulse wave tissue Doppler velocities in the assessment of ventricular wall motion. A comparison study with M-mode echocardiography.Int J Cardiol. 2004 Nov;97(2):289-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.048. Int J Cardiol. 2004. PMID: 15458697
-
[Echocardiographic and Doppler echocardiographic characterization of left ventricular diastolic function].Herz. 1990 Dec;15(6):377-92. Herz. 1990. PMID: 2279732 Review. German.
-
[Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function using Doppler echocardiography].Med Pregl. 1999 Jan-Feb;52(1-2):13-8. Med Pregl. 1999. PMID: 10352498 Review. Croatian.
Cited by
-
Computational Analysis of Cardiac Contractile Function.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Dec;24(12):1983-1994. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01814-1. Epub 2022 Oct 27. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022. PMID: 36301405 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cardiovascular complications in acromegaly: methods of assessment.Pituitary. 2001 Sep;4(4):251-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1020750514954. Pituitary. 2001. PMID: 12501975 Review.
-
Heart wall velocimetry and exogenous contrast-based cardiac flow imaging in Drosophila melanogaster using Doppler optical coherence tomography.J Biomed Opt. 2010 Sep-Oct;15(5):056020. doi: 10.1117/1.3503418. J Biomed Opt. 2010. PMID: 21054114 Free PMC article.
-
Bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients: a true hemodynamic monitoring tool.J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Oct;26(5):355-60. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9385-6. Epub 2012 Jul 27. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012. PMID: 22836724 Review.
-
Prediction of hospital outcome in septic shock: a prospective comparison of tissue Doppler and cardiac biomarkers.Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R44. doi: 10.1186/cc8931. Epub 2010 Mar 24. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 20331902 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources