Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:5391598.
doi: 10.1155/2016/5391598. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Conductive Education as a Method of Stroke Rehabilitation: A Single Blinded Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study

Affiliations

Conductive Education as a Method of Stroke Rehabilitation: A Single Blinded Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study

Judith Bek et al. Stroke Res Treat. 2016.

Abstract

Background. Conductive Education for stroke survivors has shown promise but randomised evidence is unavailable. This study assessed the feasibility of a definitive randomised controlled trial to evaluate efficacy. Methods. Adult stroke survivors were recruited through local community notices. Those completing the baseline assessment were randomised using an online program and group allocation was independent. Intervention group participants received 10 weekly 1.5-hour sessions of Conductive Education at the National Institute of Conductive Education in Birmingham, UK. The control group participants attended two group meetings. The study evaluated the feasibility of recruitment procedures, delivery of the intervention, retention of participants, and appropriateness of outcome measures and data collection methods. Independent assessments included the Barthel Index, the Stroke Impact Scale, the Timed Up and Go test, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results. Eighty-two patients were enrolled; 77 completed the baseline assessment (46 men, mean age 62.1 yrs.) and were randomised. 70 commenced the intervention (n = 37) or an equivalent waiting period (n = 33). 32/37 completed the 10-week training and 32/33 the waiting period. There were no missing items from completed questionnaires and no adverse events. Discussion. Recruitment, intervention, and assessment methods worked well. Transport issues for intervention and assessment appointments require review. Conclusion. A definitive trial is feasible. This trial is registered with ISRCTN84064492.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through the study: numbers completing each stage and reasons for non-completion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Forster A., Young J. Research networks for stroke rehabilitation: opportunities and barriers. Clinical Medicine. 2005;5(1):42–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrington R., Taylor G., Hollinghurst S., Reed M., Kay H., Wood V. A. A community-based exercise and education scheme for stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2010;24(1):3–15. doi: 10.1177/0269215509347437. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Combs S. A., Kelly S. P., Barton R., Ivaska M., Nowak K. Effects of an intensive, task-specific rehabilitation program for individuals with chronic stroke: a case series. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2010;32(8):669–678. doi: 10.3109/09638280903242716. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Green J., Forster A., Bogle S., Young J. Physiotherapy for patients with mobility problems more than 1 year after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2002;359(9302):199–203. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07443-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin K.-C., Wu C.-Y., Wei T.-H., Lee C.-Y., Liu J.-S. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2007;21(12):1075–1086. doi: 10.1177/0269215507079843. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources