Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul 12;7(3):18.
doi: 10.3390/jfb7030018.

Effect of Nanoparticle Incorporation and Surface Coating on Mechanical Properties of Bone Scaffolds: A Brief Review

Affiliations
Review

Effect of Nanoparticle Incorporation and Surface Coating on Mechanical Properties of Bone Scaffolds: A Brief Review

Jesus Corona-Gomez et al. J Funct Biomater. .

Abstract

Mechanical properties of a scaffold play an important role in its in vivo performance in bone tissue engineering, due to the fact that implanted scaffolds are typically subjected to stress including compression, tension, torsion, and shearing. Unfortunately, not all the materials used to fabricate scaffolds are strong enough to mimic native bones. Extensive research has been conducted in order to increase scaffold strength and mechanical performance by incorporating nanoparticles and/or coatings. An incredible improvement has been achieved; and some outstanding examples are the usage of nanodiamond, hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass particles, SiO₂, MgO, and silver nanoparticles. This review paper aims to present the results, to summarize significant findings, and to give perspective for future work, which could be beneficial to future bone tissue engineering.

Keywords: bioactive glass particles; biomaterials; hydroxyapatite; mechanical properties; nanodiamond; scaffold design; scaffold fabrication; silver nanoparticles; surface coating; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Improvement of apparent modulus in compression tests [8].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fracture energy in tensile tests [8].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Little C.J., Bawolin N.K., Chen X.B. Mechanical properties of natural cartilage and tissue engineered constructs. Tissue Eng. Part B. 2011;17:213–227. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0572. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bawolin N.K., Zhang W.J., Chen X.B. A brief review of the modelling of the time dependent mechanical properties of tissue engineering scaffolds. J. Biomim. Biomater. Tissue Eng. 2010;6:19–33. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBTE.6.19. - DOI
    1. Bawolin N.K., Li M.G., Chen X.B., Zhang W.J. Modeling material-degradation-induced elastic property of tissue engineering scaffolds. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2010 doi: 10.1115/1.4002551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olubamiji A., Izadifar Z., Si J., Cooper D., Eames F., Chen X.B. Modulating mechanical behavior of 3D-printed cartilage-mimetic PCL scaffolds: Influence of molecular weight & pore geometry. Biofabrication. 2016;8:25020–25037. - PubMed
    1. Bawolin N.K., Dolovich A.T., Zhang C.W., Chen X.B. Characterization of mechanical properties of tissue scaffolds by phase contrast imaging and finite element modeling. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2015 doi: 10.1115/1.4030409. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources