Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;31(3):1192-1202.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5090-8. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

Viewpoint matters: objective performance metrics for surgeon endoscope control during robot-assisted surgery

Affiliations

Viewpoint matters: objective performance metrics for surgeon endoscope control during robot-assisted surgery

Anthony M Jarc et al. Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Effective visualization of the operative field is vital to surgical safety and education. However, additional metrics for visualization are needed to complement other common measures of surgeon proficiency, such as time or errors. Unlike other surgical modalities, robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS) enables data-driven feedback to trainees through measurement of camera adjustments. The purpose of this study was to validate and quantify the importance of novel camera metrics during RAMIS.

Methods: New (n = 18), intermediate (n = 8), and experienced (n = 13) surgeons completed 25 virtual reality simulation exercises on the da Vinci Surgical System. Three camera metrics were computed for all exercises and compared to conventional efficiency measures.

Results: Both camera metrics and efficiency metrics showed construct validity (p < 0.05) across most exercises (camera movement frequency 23/25, camera movement duration 22/25, camera movement interval 19/25, overall score 24/25, completion time 25/25). Camera metrics differentiated new and experienced surgeons across all tasks as well as efficiency metrics. Finally, camera metrics significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with completion time (camera movement frequency 21/25, camera movement duration 21/25, camera movement interval 20/25) and overall score (camera movement frequency 20/25, camera movement duration 19/25, camera movement interval 20/25) for most exercises.

Conclusions: We demonstrate construct validity of novel camera metrics and correlation between camera metrics and efficiency metrics across many simulation exercises. We believe camera metrics could be used to improve RAMIS proficiency-based curricula.

Keywords: Endoscope control; Performance metrics; Proficiency; Robot-assisted surgery; Surgeon training; Visualization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A M. Jarc is a Senior Medical Research Scientist at Intuitive Surgical, Inc. M. Curet is a Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer at Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Construct validity of conventional metrics and camera metrics. A Overall score, B completion time, C camera movement frequency (CFrq), D camera movement duration (CDur), and E camera movement interval (CInt). Horizontal bars indicate significant differences between surgeon groups (p < 0.05)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Difference between novice and expert surgeons mean normalized metrics across all exercises (ordered by magnitude). Gray bars correspond to viewpoint metrics. Black bars correspond to conventional performance metrics. Error bars represent +1 SD. Top brackets indicate significant differences between metrics (p < 0.05)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fabri PJ, Zayas-Castro JL. Human error, not communication and systems, underlies surgical complications. Surgery. 2008;144(4):557–565. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gallagher AG, et al. An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(12):2684–2691. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0261-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reznick RK. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg. 1993;165(3):358–361. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80843-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goh AC, et al. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol. 2012;187(1):247–252. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen C, et al. Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skills: a novel method to evaluate surgical performance. J Surg Res. 2014;187(1):65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.09.024. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types