Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Mar;95(2):194-198.
doi: 10.1111/aos.13162. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

Endothelium-in versus endothelium-out for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation and implantation

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Endothelium-in versus endothelium-out for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation and implantation

Mohit Parekh et al. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the difference between endothelium-in and endothelium-out for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation and implantation using injection method.

Methods: The study was a randomized, comparative, institutional, laboratory investigation. Eighteen human donor corneas were included. A total of 9.5 mm DMEK grafts were stripped and restored on the corneal base with a hinge and preserved in the deswelling medium. The grafts were detached from the hinge and either manually tri-folded with the endothelium on the inside, or allowed to spontaneously roll in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with endothelium outwards. The corneas were mounted on an artificial anterior chamber (AAC) and four incisions made using a 15° eye knife for the side ports and slit knife to create a 3.0 mm incision for delivery of the graft into the AAC. The grafts with endothelium-in (endo-in) were pulled into a cartridge, whereas those with endothelium-out (endo-out) were aspirated using a modified Jones tube. Both were delivered using an injection method. Central and peripheral endothelial cell density (pre- and post-delivery and after removal), time of preparation and unfolding were measured.

Results: Endothelial cell loss postimplantation was 10.53% (±2.82) with endo-in (n = 9) compared to 7.56% (±14.74) with endo-out (n = 9) (p > 0.05). Preparation and unfolding time was 4.43 min (±3.43) and 0.96 min (±1.10) for endo-in compared to 1.68 min (±0.57) and 4.92 min (±4.21) for endo-out. A statistical significance between endo-in and endo-out for loading (p = 0.04) and unfolding (p = 0.023) time was observed.

Conclusions: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissues can be tri-folded (endo-in) with no significantly less cell loss as compared to endo-out. Spontaneous unfolding of endo-in may reduce overall time and surgical manipulation.

Keywords: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; endothelium-in; endothelium-out; preparation; transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types