ECG parameters predict left ventricular conduction delay in patients with left ventricular dysfunction
- PMID: 27424074
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.07.010
ECG parameters predict left ventricular conduction delay in patients with left ventricular dysfunction
Abstract
Background: Estimating left ventricular electrical delay (Q-LV) from a 12-lead ECG may be important in evaluating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of Q-LV interval on ECG configuration.
Methods: One hundred ninety-two consecutive patients undergoing CRT implantation were divided electrocardiographically into 3 groups: left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). The IVCD group was further subdivided into 81 patients with left (L)-IVCD and 15 patients with right (R)-IVCD (resembling RBBB, but without S wave in leads I and aVL). The Q-LV interval in the different groups and the relationship between ECG parameters and the maximum Q-LV interval were analyzed.
Results: Patients with LBBB presented a long Q-LV interval (147.7 ± 14.6 ms, all exceeding cutoff value of 110 ms), whereas RBBB patients presented a very short Q-LV interval (75.2 ± 16.3 ms, all <110 ms). Patients with an IVCD displayed a wide range of Q-LV intervals. In L-IVCD, mid-QRS notching/slurring showed the strongest correlation with a longer Q-LV interval, followed, in decreasing order, by QRS duration >150 ms and intrinsicoid deflection >60 ms. Isolated mid-QRS notching/slurring predicted Q-LV interval >110 ms in 68% of patients. The R-IVCD group presented an unexpectedly longer Q-LV interval (127.0 ± 12.5 ms; 13/15 patients had Q-LV >110 ms).
Conclusion: Patients with LBBB have a very prolonged Q-LV interval. Mid-QRS notching in lateral leads strongly predicts a longer Q-LV interval in L-IVCD patients. Patients with R-IVCD constitute a subgroup of patients with a long Q-LV interval.
Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Left bundle branch block; Left ventricular electrical delay; Nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay; Right bundle branch block.
Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Bilateral bundle branch block, an old concept revisited in the light of cardiac resynchronization therapy.Heart Rhythm. 2016 Dec;13(12):2297-2298. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 17. Heart Rhythm. 2016. PMID: 27544745 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Greater response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with true complete left bundle branch block: a PREDICT substudy.Europace. 2012 May;14(5):690-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur381. Epub 2011 Dec 14. Europace. 2012. PMID: 22170897 Clinical Trial.
-
Vectorcardiographic QRS area identifies delayed left ventricular lateral wall activation determined by electroanatomic mapping in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy.Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jan;13(1):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.07.033. Epub 2015 Jul 29. Heart Rhythm. 2016. PMID: 26232766
-
Novel approach to discriminate left bundle branch block from nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay using pacing-induced functional left bundle branch block.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;53(3):347-355. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0449-5. Epub 2018 Sep 19. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018. PMID: 30232686
-
Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy.Am J Cardiol. 2011 Mar 15;107(6):927-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.010. Am J Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21376930 Review.
-
Does Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Benefit Patients with Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Prolonged QRS Patterns?Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Oct 24;19(12):125. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0929-8. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017. PMID: 29064041 Review.
Cited by
-
Left ventricle pacing challenges in cardiac resynchronization therapy systems.Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021 Jul-Aug;21(4):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 17. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021. PMID: 33862228 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Useful Electrocardiographic Signs to Support the Prediction of Favorable Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Oct 14;10(10):425. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10100425. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023. PMID: 37887872 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early effects of left bundle branch area pacing on ventricular activation by speckle tracking echocardiography.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar;67(2):341-351. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01616-7. Epub 2023 Aug 21. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 37599321
-
Comparison of electrocardiogram parameters and echocardiographic response between distinct left bundle branch area pacing modes in heart failure patients.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 29;11:1441241. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1441241. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39267805 Free PMC article.
-
The Evolving Role of Electrocardiography in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Dec 12;21(12):91. doi: 10.1007/s11936-019-0784-6. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019. PMID: 31828564 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials