Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug:59:50-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.05.019.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin or cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Does human papilloma virus play a role?

Affiliations

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin or cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Does human papilloma virus play a role?

Dan Ou et al. Oral Oncol. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: The optimal concurrent regimen, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or bioradiotherapy (BRT), in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) remains controversial, especially in human papilloma virus-associated patients.

Material and methods: Data of 265 patients with LAHNSCC treated with CRT (cisplatin, 100mg/m(2) every 3weeks, n=194) or BRT (weekly cetuximab, n=71), including 119 patients with known HPV/p16 status were analyzed.

Results: Median follow-up was 54.5months. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control (LRC) were 51.7% vs. 36.9% (p=0.01) and 74.2% vs. 51.2% (p=0.002), both in favor of CRT. Multivariate analysis adjusted for p16 status continued to show improved outcomes (PFS and LRC) for CRT. The 5-year LRC was significantly better with CRT vs. BRT both in the p16+ subgroup (p=0.01) and in p16- or unknown subgroup (p=0.02), and 5-year PFS was of non-significant trend of improvement with CRT vs. BRT in both subgroups (p=0.07 in p16+ and p=0.09 in p16- or unknown, respectively). In the subset of oropharyngeal cancer patients with HPV/p16 status available (n=88), MVA after adjusted for other clinical co-variates showed a non-significant trend of improvement of LRC with CRT compared with BRT (HR=0.4, 95%CI, 0.1-1.0; p=0.06).

Conclusion: Our long-term results suggested better outcomes in LAHNSCC patients receiving concurrent cisplatin over cetuximab regardless of HPV/p16 status.

Keywords: Cetuximab; Chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin; HPV; Head and neck cancer; Oropharyngeal cancer; p16.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources