Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul-Sep;62(3):188-98.
doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.186390.

Genomics era and complex disorders: Implications of GWAS with special reference to coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cancers

Affiliations
Review

Genomics era and complex disorders: Implications of GWAS with special reference to coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cancers

R Pranavchand et al. J Postgrad Med. 2016 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

The Human Genome Project (HGP) has identified millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and their association with several diseases, apart from successfully characterizing the Mendelian/monogenic diseases. However, the dissection of precise etiology of complex genetic disorders still poses a challenge for human geneticists. This review outlines the landmark results of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with respect to major complex diseases - Coronary artery disease (CAD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and predominant cancers. A brief account on the current Indian scenario is also given. All the relevant publications till mid-2015 were accessed through web databases such as PubMed and Google. Several databases providing genetic information related to these diseases were tabulated and in particular, the list of the most significant SNPs identified through GWAS was made, which may be useful for designing studies in functional validation. Post-GWAS implications and emerging concepts such as epigenomics and pharmacogenomics were also discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of events contributing to the development of genomics
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histogram representing the number of GWAS and SNPs associated with each complex disease
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prevalence and death rates due to major cancers reported in the year 2012
Figure 4
Figure 4
Chromatin features and epigenetic markers of active euchromatin and repressed heterochromatin (adapted from reference 75)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yadav SP. The wholeness in suffix -omics, -omes, and the word om. J Biomol Tech. 2007;18:277. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Primer A. Genomics and its impact on science and society. The Human Genome Project and beyond. Washington, DC. Department of Energy. Office of Science 2003; United States. pp. 1–12. http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/primer2001/P... .
    1. Metzker ML. Emerging technologies in DNA sequencing. Genome Res. 2005;15:1767–76. - PubMed
    1. Chial H. DNA sequencing technologies key to the human genome project. Nat Educ. 2008;1:219.
    1. Peltonen L, Perola M, Naukkarinen J, Palotie A. Lessons from studying monogenic disease for common disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:R67–74. - PubMed