Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;25(10):1030-1037.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5701. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

Affiliations

Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

Chiang-Hua Chang et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background: It is uncertain how changes in the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendations (from annual to biennial mammography screening in women aged 50-74 and grading the evidence as insufficient for screening in women aged 75 and older) have affected mammography use among Medicare beneficiaries.

Materials and methods: Cohort study of 12 million Medicare fee-for-service women aged 65-74 and 75 and older to measure changes in 3-year screening use, 2007-2009 (before) and 2010-2012 (after), defined by two measures-proportion screened and frequency of screening by age, race/ethnicity, and hospital referral region.

Results: Fewer women were screened, but with similar frequency after 2009 for both age groups (after vs. before: age 65-74: 60.1% vs. 60.8% screened, 2.1 vs. 2.1 mammograms per screened woman; age 75 and older: 31.7% vs. 33.6% screened, 1.9 vs. 1.9 mammograms per screened woman; all p < 0.05). Black women were the only subgroup with an increase in screening use, and for both age groups (after vs. before: age 65-74: 55.4% vs. 54.0% screened and 2.0 vs. 1.9 mammograms per screened woman; age 75 and older: 28.5% vs. 27.9% screened and 1.8 vs. 1.8 mammograms per screened woman; all p < 0.05). Regional change patterns in screening were more similar between age groups (Pearson correlation r = 0.781 for proportion screened; r = 0.840 for frequency of screening) than between black versus nonblack women (Pearson correlation r = 0.221 for proportion screened; r = 0.212 for frequency of screening).

Conclusions: Changes in screening mammography use for Medicare women are not fully aligned with the 2009 recommendations.

Keywords: USPSTF recommendations; change in screening; mammography; older women; race/ethnicity difference; regional variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Disclosure Statement The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Median percentage change in proportion screened at HRRs before and after 2009 by quintiles of proportion screened before 2009. Colors for quintiles, lines for 25th and 75th percentile among HRRs within each quintile. Women aged 65–74, Women aged 75 and older.

References

    1. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:716–726, W-236 - PubMed
    1. Biller-Andorno N, Juni P. Abolishing mammography screening programs? A view from the Swiss medical board. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1965–1967 - PubMed
    1. Tosteson AN, Fryback DG, Hammond CS, et al. . Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:954–961 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walter LC, Schonberg MA. Screening mammography in older women: A review. JAMA 2014;311:1336–1347 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Welch HG, Passow HJ. Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography. JAMA Inter Med 2014;174:448–454 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources