Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Jul;95(28):e4184.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004184.

Effect of prostate volume on the peripheral nerve block anesthesia in the prostate biopsy: A strobe-compliant study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effect of prostate volume on the peripheral nerve block anesthesia in the prostate biopsy: A strobe-compliant study

Yang Luan et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of periprostatic nerve block (PNB) in transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy on different prostate volume.

Methods: A total of 568 patients received prostate biopsy in our hospital from May 2013 to September 2015 and were retrospectively studied. All patients were divided into local anesthesia group (LAG) and nerve block group (NBG). Then each group was subdivided into 4 subgroups (20-40, 40-60, 60-100, and >100 mL groups) according to different prostate volume range. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and visual numeric scale (VNS) were used to assess the patient's pain and quantify their satisfaction. The scores and complications were compared between the groups.

Results: The age and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before biopsy had no significant differences at intergroup or intragroup level. The VAS scores were significantly lower in the NBG than those in the LAG in terms of prostate volume (1 (1-2) versus 2 (1-3), 2 (1-3) versus 2 (2-4), 2 (2-3) versus 3 (2-5), 4 (3-5) versus 5 (4-7), all P < 0.05). Conversely, the VNS scores were higher in the NBG (4 (3-4) versus 3.5 (3-4), 3 (3-4) versus 3 (3-3), 3 (2-4) versus 3 (2-3), 2 (2-2) versus 1 (1-2), all P < 0.05). Patients with smaller prostate volume undergoing PNB or local anesthesia experienced significantly lower pain and higher satisfaction scores than those with large prostate. Whether in PNB or local anesthesia group, patients with large prostate volume had more chance to have hematuria, hemospermia, urinary retention than smaller one except infection (P < 0.05). Those complications had no significant differences between LAG and NBG (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with local anesthesia, ultrasound-guided PNB has superior analgesic effect and equal safety, but for patients with a large prostate volume, the analgesic effect is inefficient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box-plot of VAS scores in different anesthesia with different prostate volume. The difference of VAS scores between local anesthesia group and nerve anesthesia group were statistically significant, P values of each prostate volume subgroup were 0.001, 0.002, 0.006, and 0.011, respectively. The VAS scores also had significant difference between different prostate volume in local anesthesia group and nerve anesthesia group, respectively (both P < 0.001). VAS = visual analogue scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box-plot of VNS scores in different anesthesia with different prostate volume. Compared with the local anesthesia group, the VNS scores were significantly higher in nerve anesthesia group in terms of prostate volume (all P < 0.05). In 2 groups, the VNS scores possess significant difference between different prostate volume (both P < 0.001). VNS = visual numeric scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66:115–132. - PubMed
    1. Heijnsdijk EA, Wever EM, Auvinen A, et al. Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:595–605. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roobol MJ, Kranse R, Bangma CH, et al. Reply from authors re: Michael Baum. Screening for prostate cancer: can we learn from the mistakes of the breast screening experience? Eur Urol 2013;64:540-1: screening for prostate cancer: we have learned and are still learning. Eur Urol 2013; 64:541–543. - PubMed
    1. Taira AV, Merrick GS, Galbreath RW, et al. Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2010; 13:71–77. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types