Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:7284070.
doi: 10.1155/2016/7284070. Epub 2016 Jun 26.

Atypical Chest Pain: An Unusual Presentation of Spinal Metastasis due to Penile Carcinoma

Affiliations

Atypical Chest Pain: An Unusual Presentation of Spinal Metastasis due to Penile Carcinoma

Sarah Pywell et al. Case Rep Surg. 2016.

Abstract

Spinal metastases may present in a myriad of ways, most commonly back pain with or without neurology. We report an unusual presentation of isolated atypical chest pain preceding metastatic cord compression, secondary to penile carcinoma. Spinal metastasis from penile carcinoma is rare with few cases reported. This unusual presentation highlights the need for a heightened level of clinical suspicion for spinal metastases as a possible cause for chest pain in any patients with a history of carcinoma. The case is discussed with reference to the literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) CT scan at the time of penile resection. (b) CT scan at the time of A+E presentation with weakness.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MRI scan, sagittal T2 weighted image, showing posterior soft tissue mass at the level of T5 with associated pathological fracture and diffuse paravertebral oedema. There is evidence of moderate compression of the spinal cord.
Figure 3
Figure 3
MRI scan, axial T1 weighted image, showing posterior soft tissue mass at the level of T5 with associated pathological fracture and diffuse paravertebral oedema. There is evidence of moderate compression of the spinal cord.

References

    1. Culkin D. J., Beer T. M. Advanced penile carcinoma. The Journal of Urology. 2003;170(2, part 1):359–365. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000062829.43654.5e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horenblas S., Van Tinteren H., Delemarre J. F. M., Moonen L. M. F., Lustig V., Kroger R. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: accuracy of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system, and role of lymphangiography, computerized tomography scan and fine needle aspiration cytology. The Journal of Urology. 1991;146(5):1279–1283. - PubMed
    1. Ornellas A. A., Seixas A. L. C., Marota A., Wisnescky A., Campos F., De Moraes J. R. Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 350 cases. The Journal of Urology. 1994;151(5):1244–1249. - PubMed
    1. Ravi R. Prophylactic lymphadenectomy vs observation vs inguinal biopsy in node-negative patients with invasive carcinoma of the penis. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1993;23(1):53–58. - PubMed
    1. Riveros M., Gorostiaga R. Cancer of the penis. Archives of Surgery. 1962;85(3):377–382. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1962.01310030025004. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources