Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;2(4):10.15226/2374-6890/2/4/00131.
doi: 10.15226/2374-6890/2/4/00131. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

Telemedicine and Diabetic Retinopathy: Review of Published Screening Programs

Affiliations

Telemedicine and Diabetic Retinopathy: Review of Published Screening Programs

Kevin Tozer et al. J Endocrinol Diabetes. 2015.

Abstract

Background: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide even though successful treatments exist. Improving screening and treatment could avoid many cases of vision loss. However, due to an increasing prevalence of diabetes, traditional in-person screening for DR for every diabetic patient is not feasible. Telemedicine is one viable solution to provide high-quality and efficient screening to large number of diabetic patients.

Purpose: To provide a narrative review of large DR telemedicine screening programs.

Methods: Articles were identified through a comprehensive search of the English-language literature published between 2000 and 2014. Telemedicine screening programs were included for review if they had published data on at least 150 patients and had available validation studies supporting their model. Screening programs were then categorized according to their American Telemedicine Association Validation Level.

Results: Seven programs from the US and abroad were identified and included in the review. Three programs were Category 1 programs (Ophdiat, EyePacs, and Digiscope), two were Category 2 programs (Eye Check, NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Program), and two were Category 3 programs (Joslin Vision Network, Alberta Screening Program). No program was identified that claimed category 4 status. Programs ranged from community or city level programs to large nationwide programs including millions of individuals. The programs demonstrated a high level of clinical accuracy in screening for DR. There was no consensus amongst the programs regarding the need for dilation, need for stereoscopic images, or the level of training for approved image graders.

Conclusion: Telemedicine programs have been clinically validated and successfully implemented across the globe. They can provide a high-level of clinical accuracy for screening for DR while improving patient access in a cost-effective and scalable manner.

Keywords: Diabetic retinopathy; Screening programs; Telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kobrin Klein BE. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic epidemiology. 2007;14(4):179–183. - PubMed
    1. Group ETDRSR. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(12):1796–1806. - PubMed
    1. Paz SH, Varma R, Klein R, Wu J, Azen SP Group LALES. Noncompliance with vision care guidelines in Latinos with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1372–1377. - PubMed
    1. Lee PP, Feldman ZW, Ostermann J, Brown DS, Sloan FA. Longitudinal rates of annual eye examinations of persons with diabetes and chronic eye diseases. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(10):1952–1959. - PubMed
    1. Huang ES, Basu A, O’Grady M, Capretta JC. Projecting Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the U.S. 2009;32(12):2225–2229. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources