Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 18;16(1):41.
doi: 10.1186/s12902-016-0122-x.

Understanding preferences for type 2 diabetes mellitus self-management support through a patient-centered approach: a 2-phase mixed-methods study

Affiliations

Understanding preferences for type 2 diabetes mellitus self-management support through a patient-centered approach: a 2-phase mixed-methods study

Janice M S Lopez et al. BMC Endocr Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who participate in diabetes management programs have been shown to have better glycemic control and slower disease progression, although program participation remains low. In the USA, increasing participation in diabetes management support programs may also directly impact provider reimbursement, as payments are increasingly based on patient-centered measures. However, little is known about factors that may enhance patient participation. This study aimed at further understanding what is important in diabetes management support from the patients' perspective and at assessing the utilization of various types of diabetes-management programs.

Methods: A two-phase mixed-methods study was conducted of adult US members of PatientsLikeMe®, an online research network of patients. Phase 1 comprised qualitative interviews with 10 individuals to inform the online survey's contents, aided by literature review. During phase 2, this online survey was completed by 294 participants who reported on their diabetes goals and preferences for T2DM self-management support programs.

Results: The majority of the respondents were not participating in any program (65 %), but most had goals of improving diet (77 %), weight loss (71 %), and achieving stable blood glucose levels (71 %). Among those currently participating in programs, clinic, hospital-based, or other health-care professional programs were the most commonly used (51 %). The most preferred type of support was diet/weight-loss support (62 %), while doctors or nurses (61 %) and dietitians (55 %) were the most preferred sources of diabetes support.

Conclusions: The low participation in diabetes self-management programs revealed in this study underscores the need for strategies to improve patient engagement. The results revealed support types and formats that patients with T2DM prefer and need. These findings may help improve patient engagement by guiding the future design of more effective diabetes management support programs.

Keywords: Diabetes management support; Patient participation; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of study participants. aParticipation rate = 37.1 %; bCompletion rate = 30.4 %
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Program utilization among survey respondents currently participating in a form of supporta (n = 101). HCP, health-care professional. aRespondents could have participated in more than one program
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overall satisfaction with health-care team in the past year by current program participationa. a Z = −2.28; P = 0.0022
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Types of support preferred by survey respondents. HCP, health-care professional
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Sources of support preferred by survey respondents
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Format of support most preferred by respondentsa (n = 294). aParticipants could select more than one form of support

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Reform and Quality. Guide to Patient and Family Engagement in Hospital Quality and Safety. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/hospital/engagingfamilies/. Accessed 23 May 2015.
    1. James J. Patient Engagement. People actively involved in their health and health-care tend to have better outcomes – and, some evidence suggests, lower costs. In: HealthPolicyBriefs. Health Affairs. 2013. http://healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief_pdfs/healthpolicybrief.... Accessed 23 May 2015.
    1. Barello S, Graffigna G, Vegni E. Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:905934. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centred approach. Update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015;58(3):429–42. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3460-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Millenson M, Macri J. Will the Affordable Care Act Move Patient-Centeredness to Center Stage? In: Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 2012. http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/reports/2012/rwjf72412. Accessed 23 May 2015.