Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 2;17(17):1606-11.
doi: 10.1002/cbic.201600223. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

Characterization of Enzymes Catalyzing Transformations of Cysteine S-Conjugated Intermediates in the Lincosamide Biosynthetic Pathway

Affiliations

Characterization of Enzymes Catalyzing Transformations of Cysteine S-Conjugated Intermediates in the Lincosamide Biosynthetic Pathway

Richiro Ushimaru et al. Chembiochem. .

Abstract

Lincosamides such as lincomycin A, celesticetin, and Bu-2545, constitute an important group of antibiotics. These natural products are characterized by a thiooctose linked to a l-proline residue, but they differ with regards to modifications of the thioacetal moiety, the pyrrolidine ring, and the octose core. Here we report that the pyridoxal 5'-phosphate-dependent enzyme CcbF (celesticetin biosynthetic pathway) is a decarboxylating deaminase that converts a cysteine S-conjugated intermediate into an aldehyde. In contrast, the homologous enzyme LmbF (lincomycin biosynthetic pathway) catalyzes C-S bond cleavage of the same intermediate to afford a thioglycoside. We show that Ccb4 and LmbG (downstream methyltransferases) convert the aldehyde and thiol intermediates into a variety of methylated lincosamide compounds including Bu-2545. The substrates used in these studies are the β-anomers of the natural substrates. The findings not only provide insight into how the biosynthetic pathway of lincosamide antibiotics can bifurcate to generate different lincosamides, but also reveal the promiscuity of the enzymes involved.

Keywords: biosynthesis; catalytic mechanisms; enzymes; lincosamides; pyridoxal 5′-phosphate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
LC-MS analysis of CcbF and CcbF/Ccb4 coupled reactions with . Peaks correspond to [M+H]+ and [M+Na]+ signals from positive ion ESI. a) CcbF reaction with and without derivatization, b) after treatment with DNPH. c) CcbF/Ccb4 coupled reaction with and without derivatization, b) after treatment with DNPH.
Figure 2
Figure 2
LC-MS analysis of LmbF-catalyzed C–S bond cleavage of . Peaks correspond to [M+H]+ and [M+Na]+ signals from positive ion ESI. a) Direct analysis without derivatization, b) after treatment with mBBr.
Figure 3
Figure 3
LC-MS analysis of coupled enzymatic assays using LmbF, LmbG, Ccb4. Peaks correspond to [M+H]+ and [M+Na]+ signals from positive ion ESI. a) LmbF/LmbG coupled reaction without derivatization, b) after the treatment with mBBr. c) LmbF/Ccb4 coupled reaction without derivatization, d) after treatment with mBBr. e) LmbF/LmbG/Ccb4 coupled reaction without derivatization, f) after treatment with mBBr.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Structures of representative lincosamide antibiotics.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Proposed biosynthetic pathways for lincosamide antibiotics.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Preparation of the putative substrate of CcbF (). a) hydrazine, reflux, 22 h, 57%; b) 1H-imidazole-1-sulfonyl azide hydrochloride, CuSO4, K2CO3, MeOH/H2O, 35 h, 51%; c) PMBCl, NaH, TBAI, DMF, rt, 12 h, 79%; d) Br2, DCM, 0 °C, 15 min; e) N-Cbz-L-cysteine benzyl ester, TBAHS, Na2CO3, AcOEt, 11 h, 38% over 2 steps; f) PMe3, THF/H2O, rt, 20 h; g) N-methyl-L-proline, EDC, HOBt, DMF, rt, 12 h, 26% over 2 steps; h) TFA, DCM, rt, 30 min, 31%; i) H2, Pd(OH)2/C, AcOH, MeOH/H2O, rt, 4 h, 70%..
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Proposed mechanisms for PLP-dependent reactions catalyzed by LmbF and CcbF.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Spizek J, Novotna J, Rezanka T. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2004;56:121–154. - PubMed
    2. Lin C-I, McCarty RM, Liu H-w. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:4377–4407. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewis C, Clapp HW, Grady JE. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1963:570–582.
    2. Mason DJ, Lewis C. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1964:7–12. - PubMed
    3. Mason DJ, Dietz A, DeBoer C. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1962:554–559.
    4. Herr RR, Bergy ME. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1962:560–564.
    5. Hoeksema H, Bannister B, Birkenmeyer RD, Kagan F, Magerlein BJ, MacKellar FA, Schroeder W, Slomp G, Herr RR. J Am Chem Soc. 1964;86:4223–4224.
    6. Reusser F. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975;7:32–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoeksema H, Crum GF, DeVries WH. Antibiot Annu. 1955;2:837–841.
    2. Hoeksema H. J Am Chem Soc. 1968;90:755–757. - PubMed
    1. Hanada M, Tsunakawa M, Tomita K, Tsukiura H, Kawaguchi H. J Antibiot. 1980;33:751–753. - PubMed
    2. Toda S, Nakagawa S, Naito T, Kawaguchi H. J Antibiot. 1981;34:596–569. - PubMed
    1. Poehlsgaard J, Douthwaite S. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:870–881. - PubMed
    2. Dunkle JA, Xiong L, Mankin AS, Cate JHD. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:17152–17157. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources