Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 19;14(1):50.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0126-z.

A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment

Affiliations

A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment

Pavel V Ovseiko et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Global investment in biomedical research has grown significantly over the last decades, reaching approximately a quarter of a trillion US dollars in 2010. However, not all of this investment is distributed evenly by gender. It follows, arguably, that scarce research resources may not be optimally invested (by either not supporting the best science or by failing to investigate topics that benefit women and men equitably). Women across the world tend to be significantly underrepresented in research both as researchers and research participants, receive less research funding, and appear less frequently than men as authors on research publications. There is also some evidence that women are relatively disadvantaged as the beneficiaries of research, in terms of its health, societal and economic impacts. Historical gender biases may have created a path dependency that means that the research system and the impacts of research are biased towards male researchers and male beneficiaries, making it inherently difficult (though not impossible) to eliminate gender bias. In this commentary, we - a group of scholars and practitioners from Africa, America, Asia and Europe - argue that gender-sensitive research impact assessment could become a force for good in moving science policy and practice towards gender equity. Research impact assessment is the multidisciplinary field of scientific inquiry that examines the research process to maximise scientific, societal and economic returns on investment in research. It encompasses many theoretical and methodological approaches that can be used to investigate gender bias and recommend actions for change to maximise research impact. We offer a set of recommendations to research funders, research institutions and research evaluators who conduct impact assessment on how to include and strengthen analysis of gender equity in research impact assessment and issue a global call for action.

Keywords: Athena SWAN; Call for action; Gender; Health research; Path dependency; Research impact assessment; Science policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The gender equity pathway to maximise research impact. Shown are the forces that influence the key stakeholders in promoting gender equity to maximise different possible types of research impact
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Four “As” of research impact assessment with regard to gender equity

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klinge I. Bringing gender expertise to biomedical and health-related research. Gend Med. 2007;4(Suppl 2):S59–63. doi: 10.1016/S1550-8579(07)80047-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edmunds LD, Ovseiko PV, Shepperd S, Greenhalgh T, Frith P, Roberts NW, et al. Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence. Lancet. 2016;pii: S0140-6736(15)01091-0. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01091-0. Ahead of print. - PubMed
    1. Pololi LH, Jones SJ. Women faculty: an analysis of their experiences in academic medicine and their coping strategies. Gend Med. 2010;7(5):438–50. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.09.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pololi LH, Civian JT, Brennan RT, Dottolo AL, Krupat E. Experiencing the culture of academic medicine: gender matters, a national study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(2):201–7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2207-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources