Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 15;122(22):3564-3575.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.30162. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

Randomized trial finds that prostate cancer genetic risk score feedback targets prostate-specific antigen screening among at-risk men

Affiliations

Randomized trial finds that prostate cancer genetic risk score feedback targets prostate-specific antigen screening among at-risk men

Aubrey R Turner et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening may reduce death due to prostate cancer but leads to the overdiagnosis of many cases of indolent cancer. Targeted use of PSA screening may reduce overdiagnosis. Multimarker genomic testing shows promise for risk assessment and could be used to target PSA screening.

Methods: To test whether counseling based on the family history (FH) and counseling based on a genetic risk score (GRS) plus FH would differentially affect subsequent PSA screening at 3 months (primary outcome), a randomized trial of FH versus GRS plus FH was conducted with 700 whites aged 40 to 49 years without prior PSA screening. Secondary outcomes included anxiety, recall, physician discussion at 3 months, and PSA screening at 3 years. Pictographs versus numeric presentations of genetic risk were also evaluated.

Results: At 3 months, no significant differences were observed in the rates of PSA screening between the FH arm (2.1%) and the GRS-FH arm (4.5% with GRS-FH vs. 2.1% with FH: χ2 = 3.13, P = .077); however, PSA screening rates at 3 months significantly increased with given risk in the GRS-FH arm (P = .013). Similar results were observed for discussions with physicians at 3 months and PSA screening at 3 years. Average anxiety levels decreased after the individual cancer risk was provided (P = .0007), with no differences between groups. Visual presentation by pictographs did not significantly alter comprehension or anxiety.

Conclusions: This is likely the first randomized trial of multimarker genomic testing to report genomic targeting of cancer screening. This study found little evidence of concern about excess anxiety or overuse/underuse of PSA screening when multimarker genetic risks were provided to patients. Cancer 2016;122:3564-3575. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Keywords: genetic counseling; genetic risk score; genetic testing; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening; randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study design, enrollment, and outcomes
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of Genetic Risk Scores Given to Study Participants in FH (A) and GRS+FH (B) arms
Red bars represent the percentage of participants given a specific risk value. Black dashed line at 18.3% represents the average risk that was also provided on each participant risk report.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of Genetic Risk Scores Given to Study Participants in FH (A) and GRS+FH (B) arms
Red bars represent the percentage of participants given a specific risk value. Black dashed line at 18.3% represents the average risk that was also provided on each participant risk report.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Participant health behaviors, in FH and GRS+FH arms, stratified by given risk
Black bars represent the percentage of participants that reported engaging in health behaviors during three month follow-up. Blue bars represent these same percentages, but stratified by category of given risk. Risk categories are <1, 1-2, 2-3, and >3-fold higher than the population average of 18.3% (categories were 0-17%, 18-35%, 37-54%, 55-80%, respectively) a. Discussed PSA screening with physician per self-report during 3 month follow-up. b. Engaged in PSA screening per self-report during 3 month follow-up. c. Engaged in PSA screening, per medical record review, during 3 years of follow-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Participant health behaviors, in FH and GRS+FH arms, stratified by given risk
Black bars represent the percentage of participants that reported engaging in health behaviors during three month follow-up. Blue bars represent these same percentages, but stratified by category of given risk. Risk categories are <1, 1-2, 2-3, and >3-fold higher than the population average of 18.3% (categories were 0-17%, 18-35%, 37-54%, 55-80%, respectively) a. Discussed PSA screening with physician per self-report during 3 month follow-up. b. Engaged in PSA screening per self-report during 3 month follow-up. c. Engaged in PSA screening, per medical record review, during 3 years of follow-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Participant health behaviors, in FH and GRS+FH arms, stratified by given risk
Black bars represent the percentage of participants that reported engaging in health behaviors during three month follow-up. Blue bars represent these same percentages, but stratified by category of given risk. Risk categories are <1, 1-2, 2-3, and >3-fold higher than the population average of 18.3% (categories were 0-17%, 18-35%, 37-54%, 55-80%, respectively) a. Discussed PSA screening with physician per self-report during 3 month follow-up. b. Engaged in PSA screening per self-report during 3 month follow-up. c. Engaged in PSA screening, per medical record review, during 3 years of follow-up.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moyer VA, on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120–134. - PubMed
    1. American Urological Association. accessed July 1, 2015. http://www.auanet.org/education/policy-statements/early-detection-of-pro....
    1. American Cancer Society. accessed February 25, 2016. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostatecancer/detailedguide/prostate-cance....
    1. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. accessed February 25, 2016. http://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/
    1. Schröder FH. Landmarks in prostate cancer screening. BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(Suppl 1):3–7. - PubMed