Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;31(12):1444-1451.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3756-5. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

Self-Reported Rationing Behavior Among US Physicians: A National Survey

Robert D Sheeler  1 , Tim Mundell  2 , Samia A Hurst  3 , Susan Dorr Goold  4 , Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir  5   6 , Jon C Tilburt  5   7   8   9 , Marion Danis  10
Affiliations

Self-Reported Rationing Behavior Among US Physicians: A National Survey

Robert D Sheeler et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Rationing is a controversial topic among US physicians. Understanding their attitudes and behaviors around rationing may be essential to a more open and sensible professional discourse on this important but controversial topic.

Objective: To describe rationing behavior and associated factors among US physicians.

Design: Survey mailed to US physicians in 2012 to evaluate self-reported rationing behavior and variables related to this behavior.

Setting: US physicians across a full spectrum of practice settings.

Participants: A total of 2541 respondents, representing 65.6 % of the original mailing list of 3872 US addresses.

Interventions: The study was a cross-sectional analysis of physician attitudes and self-reported behaviors, with neutral language representations of the behaviors as well as an embedded experiment to test the influence of the word "ration" on perceived responsibility.

Main outcome measures: Overall percentage of respondents reporting rationing behavior in various contexts and assessment of attitudes toward rationing.

Key results: In total, 1348 respondents (53.1 %) reported having personally refrained within the past 6 months from using specific clinical services that would have provided the best patient care, because of health system cost. Prescription drugs (n = 1073 [48.3 %]) and magnetic resonance imaging (n = 922 [44.5 %]) were most frequently rationed. Surgical and procedural specialists were less likely to report rationing behavior (adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95 % CI], 0.8 [0.9-0.9] and 0.5 [0.4-0.6], respectively) compared to primary care. Compared with small or solo practices, those in medical school settings reported less rationing (adjusted OR [95 % CI], 0.4 [0.2-0.7]). Physicians who self-identified as very or somewhat liberal were significantly less likely to report rationing (adjusted OR [95 % CI], 0.7 [0.6-0.9]) than those self-reporting being very or somewhat conservative. A more positive opinion about rationing tended to align with greater odds of rationing.

Conclusions: More than one-half of respondents engaged in behavior consistent with rationing. Practicing physicians in specific subgroups were more likely to report rationing behavior.

Keywords: cost; physician attitudes; physician behavior; rationing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Randomization scheme for wording experiment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of responses to three randomized versions of wording about physicians’ responsibility for containing health care costs. Note: Differences between groups and overall were all statistically significant (Group 1 vs. Group 2: p = 0.0003; Group 1 vs. Group 3: p < 0.0001; Group 2 vs. Group 3: p < 0.0001; Group 1 vs. Group 2 vs. Group 3: p < 0.0001).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tilburt JC, Wynia MK, Sheeler RD, et al. Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs. JAMA. 2013;310(4):380–388. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8278. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ginsburg ME, Kravitz RL, Sandberg WA. A survey of physician attitudes and practices concerning cost-effectiveness in patient care. West J Med. 2000;173(6):390–394. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.173.6.390. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hurst SA, Slowther AM, Forde R, et al. Prevalence and determinants of physician bedside rationing: data from Europe. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(11):1138–1143. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00551.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hurst SA, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther AM, Pegoraro R, Forde R, Danis M. Should ethics consultants help clinicians face scarcity in their practice? J Med Ethics. 2008;34(4):241–246. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019828. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hurst S, Forde R, Slowther A, Danis M. The interaction of bedside rationing and the fairness of health care systems: Physicians’ views. In: Danis M, Fleck L, Hurst S, Forde R, Slowther A, editors. Fair Resource Allocation And Rationing at the Bedside. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. pp. 29–39.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources