Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2016 Oct;87(5):479-84.
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1212180. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

Implant survival and radiographic outcome of total hip replacement in patients less than 20 years old

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Implant survival and radiographic outcome of total hip replacement in patients less than 20 years old

Masako Tsukanaka et al. Acta Orthop. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background and purpose - Total hip replacement (THR) is not recommended for children and very young teenagers because early and repetitive revisions are likely. We investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of THR performed in children and teenage patients. Patients and methods - We included 111 patients (132 hips) who underwent THR before 20 years of age. They were identified in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, together with information on the primary diagnosis, types of implants, and any revisions that required implant change. Radiographs and Harris hip score (HHS) were also evaluated. Results - The mean age at primary THR was 17 (11-19) years and the mean follow-up time was 14 (3-26) years. The 10-year survival rate after primary THR (with the endpoint being any revision) was 70%. 39 patients had at least 1 revision and 16 patients had 2 or more revisions. In the latest radiographs, osteolysis and atrophy were observed in 19% and 27% of the acetabulae and 21% and 62% of the femurs, respectively. The mean HHS at the final follow-up was 83 (15-100). Interpretation - The clinical score after THR in these young patients was acceptable, but many revisions had been performed. However, young patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip had lower implant survival. Moreover, the bone stock in these patients was poor, which could complicate future revisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of patient inclusion and data collection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Example of cortical atrophy of fixed stem (white arrow).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Survival curves. a. Primary THR with revision as endpoint. b. Primary THR operated during the periods 1987–1998 and 1999–2010. c. Primary THR with cup change as endpoint. d. Primary THR with stem change as endpoint. e. First revision with second revision as endpoint.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adelani M A, Crook K, Barrack R L, Maloney W J, Clohisy J C. What is the prognosis of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients 55 years and younger? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(5): 1518–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adolphson P Y, Salemyr M O, Skoldenberg O G, Boden H S. Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(1): 14–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aksnes L H, Bauer H C, Jebsen N L, Folleras G, Allert C, Haugen G S, et al. . Limb-sparing surgery preserves more function than amputation: a Scandinavian sarcoma group study of 118 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90(6): 786–94. - PubMed
    1. Bessette B J, Fassier F, Tanzer M, Brooks C E. Total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 21 years: a minimum, 10-year follow-up. Can J Surg 2003; 46(4): 257–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bischel O, Seeger J B, Kruger M, Bitsch R G. Multiple acetabular revisions in THA - poor outcome despite maximum effort. Open Orthop J 2012; 6: 488–94. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources