Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul 19;6(7):e010416.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010416.

Making decisions at the end of life when caring for a person with dementia: a literature review to explore the potential use of heuristics in difficult decision-making

R Mathew  1 , N Davies  1 , J Manthorpe  2 , S Iliffe  1
Affiliations
Review

Making decisions at the end of life when caring for a person with dementia: a literature review to explore the potential use of heuristics in difficult decision-making

R Mathew et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Decision-making, when providing care and treatment for a person with dementia at the end of life, can be complex and challenging. There is a lack of guidance available to support practitioners and family carers, and even those experienced in end of life dementia care report a lack of confidence in decision-making. It is thought that the use of heuristics (rules of thumb) may aid decision-making. The aim of this study is to identify whether heuristics are used in end of life dementia care, and if so, to identify the context in which they are being used.

Design: A narrative literature review was conducted taking a systematic approach to the search strategy, using the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines. Rapid appraisal methodology was used in order to source specific and relevant literature regarding the use of heuristics in end of life dementia care.

Data sources: A search using terms related to dementia, palliative care and decision-making was conducted across 4 English language electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) in 2015.

Results: The search identified 12 papers that contained an algorithm, guideline, decision tool or set of principles that we considered compatible with heuristic decision-making. The papers addressed swallowing and feeding difficulties, the treatment of pneumonia, management of pain and agitation, rationalising medication, ending life-sustaining treatment, and ensuring a good death.

Conclusions: The use of heuristics in palliative or end of life dementia care is not described in the research literature. However, this review identified important decision-making principles, which are largely a reflection of expert opinion. These principles may have the potential to be developed into simple heuristics that could be used in practice.

Keywords: Decision-making; PALLIATIVE CARE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Heuristic used to determine if patients presenting to the emergency department need admission to the coronary care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example heuristic.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rait G, Walters K, Bottomley C et al. . Survival of people with clinical diagnosis of dementia in primary care: cohort study. BMJ 2010;341:c3584 10.1136/bmj.c3584 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dixon J, King D, Matosevic T et al. . Equity in the provision of palliative care in the UK: review of evidence. London: LSE/PSSRU/Marie Curie, 2015.
    1. Davies N, Maio L, Vedavanam K et al. . Barriers to the provision of high-quality palliative care for people with dementia in England: a qualitative study of professionals’ experiences . Health Soc Care Community 2014;22:386–94. 10.1111/hsc.12094 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Steen JT, Radbruch L, Hertogh CMPM et al. . White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: a Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. Palliat Med 2014;28:197–209. 10.1177/0269216313493685 - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guidance on cancer services; improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, 2004.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources