Assessing Commercially Available Personal Health Records for Home Health: Recommendations for Design
- PMID: 27437046
- PMCID: PMC4941845
- DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2015-11-RA-0156
Assessing Commercially Available Personal Health Records for Home Health: Recommendations for Design
Abstract
Background: Home health nurses and clients experience unmet information needs when transitioning from hospital to home health. Personal health records (PHRs) support consumer-centered information management activities. Previous work has assessed PHRs associated with healthcare providers, but these systems leave home health nurses unable to access necessary information.
Objectives: To evaluate the ability of publically available PHRs to accept, manage, and share information from a home health case study.
Methods: Two researchers accessed the publically available PHRs on myPHR.com, and attempted to enter, manage, and share the case study data. We qualitatively described the PHR features, and identified gaps between the case study information and PHR functionality.
Results: Eighteen PHRs were identified in our initial search. Seven systems met our inclusion criteria, and are included in this review. The PHRs were able to accept basic medical information. Gaps occurred when entering, managing, and/or sharing data from the acute care and home health episodes. The PHRs that were reviewed were unable to effectively manage the case study information. Therefore, increasing consumer health literacy through these systems may be difficult. The PHRs that we reviewed were also unable to electronically share their data.
Conclusions: The gap between the existing functionality and the information needs from the case study may make these PHRs difficult to use for home health environments. Additional work is needed to increase the functionality of the PHR systems to better fit the data needs of home health clients.
Keywords: Personal health record; home health nursing; personal health records; qualitative research.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
-
- Osborn R, Moulds D, Squires D, Doty MM, Anderson C. International survey of older adults finds shortcomings in access, coordination, and patient-centered care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014; 33(12): 2247-2255. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0947. PubMed PMID: 25410260. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Olsen RM, Hellzen O, Skotnes LH, Enmarker I. Breakdown in informational continuity of care during hospitalization of older home-living patients: a case study. Int J Integr Care 2014; 14: e012 PubMed PMID: 24868195; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4027933. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Dykes PC, Samal L, Donahue M, Greenberg JO, Hurley AC, Hasan O, O’Malley TA, Venkatesh AK, Volk LA, Bates DW. A patient-centered longitudinal care plan: vision versus reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21(6): 1082-1090. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013–002454. PubMed PMID: 24996874; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4215040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bowles KH, Pham J, O’Connor M, Horowitz D. Information deficits in home care: a barrier to evidence-based disease management. HHCMP 2010; 22(4): 278-285.
-
- Connecting for Health, Markle Foundation. The personal health working group: final report. New York, NY: Markle Foundation; [Internet] 2003. [cited 2015 December 1]. 58 p. Available from: http://www.markle.org/publications/1429-personal-health-working-group-fi...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous