Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 15;7(2):516-33.
doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-11-RA-0150. eCollection 2016.

Exploring Dental Providers' Workflow in an Electronic Dental Record Environment

Affiliations

Exploring Dental Providers' Workflow in an Electronic Dental Record Environment

Kelsey M Schwei et al. Appl Clin Inform. .

Abstract

Background: A workflow is defined as a predefined set of work steps and partial ordering of these steps in any environment to achieve the expected outcome. Few studies have investigated the workflow of providers in a dental office. It is important to understand the interaction of dental providers with the existing technologies at point of care to assess breakdown in the workflow which could contribute to better technology designs.

Objective: The study objective was to assess electronic dental record (EDR) workflows using time and motion methodology in order to identify breakdowns and opportunities for process improvement.

Methods: A time and motion methodology was used to study the human-computer interaction and workflow of dental providers with an EDR in four dental centers at a large healthcare organization. A data collection tool was developed to capture the workflow of dental providers and staff while they interacted with an EDR during initial, planned, and emergency patient visits, and at the front desk. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was conducted on the observational data.

Results: Breakdowns in workflow were identified while posting charges, viewing radiographs, e-prescribing, and interacting with patient scheduler. EDR interaction time was significantly different between dentists and dental assistants (6:20 min vs. 10:57 min, p = 0.013) and between dentists and dental hygienists (6:20 min vs. 9:36 min, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: On average, a dentist spent far less time than dental assistants and dental hygienists in data recording within the EDR.

Keywords: Time and motion studies; dental clinics; dental records; health information systems; process assessment (health care); workflow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Data collection tool used for coding the observational data
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of Observation Data. Observation data broken down into dental centers, roles, and type of patient encounter
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Boxplot for distributions of time spent on different activities by dentists
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Time and Motion Analysis of a Dentist’s Workflow During an Initial Visit. In the time and motion plot, the x-axis is measured by seconds and the y-axis is the activities to them. The different colored horizontal bars show the duration of each of the activities as well as the information categories the dentist tried to perform. The gray and white horizontal sections are the categories of different groups of activities: data related, patient related, talking, walking, and miscellaneous
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Time and Motion Analysis of a Dentist’s Workflow During a Planned Visit. In the time and motion plot, the x-axis is measured by seconds and the y-axis is the activities to them. The different colored horizontal bars show the duration of each of the activities as well as the information categories the dentist tried to perform. The gray and white horizontal sections are the categories of different groups of activities: data related, patient related, talking, walking, and miscellaneous
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Time and Motion Analysis of a Dentist’s Workflow During an Emergency Visit. In the time and motion plot, the x-axis is measured by seconds and the y-axis is the activities to them. The different colored horizontal bars show the duration of each of the activities as well as the information categories the dentist tried to perform. The gray and white horizontal sections are the categories of different groups of activities: data related, patient related, talking, walking, and miscellaneous
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Activity Distribution. Distribution of activities for dentists across all dental centers
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Activity (Summary) vs. Information for Dentists at Three Different Visit Types. This shows the heat map analysis for the dentists’ role for three different types of encounters. The key for the correlation 0 to 1 is on the right side of the figure

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schleyer TK, Thyvalikakath TP, Spallek H, Torres-Urquidy MH, Hernandez P, Yuhaniak J. Clinical computing in general dentistry. J Am Medical Inform Assoc 2006;13(3): 344-352. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Irwin JY, Torres-Urquidy MH, Schleyer T, Monaco V. A preliminary model of work during initial examination and treatment planning appointments. Br Dent J 2009; 206(1): E1. - PubMed
    1. Wagner IV, Ireland RS, Eaton KA. Digital clinical records and practice administration in primary dental care. Br Dent J 2008; 204(7): 387-395. - PubMed
    1. Niazkhani Z, Pirnejad H, Berg M, Aarts J. The impact of computerized provider order entry systems on inpatient clinical workflow: a literature review J Am Medical Inform Assoc 2009; 14(4): 539-549. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zheng K, Haftel HM, Hirschl RB, O’Reilly M, Hanauer DA. Quantifying the impact of health IT implementation on clinical workflow: a new methodological perspective. J Am Medical Inform Assoc 2010; 17(4): 454-461. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types