Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 29;7(2):604-23.
doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-12-RA-0182. eCollection 2016.

Feasibility of Population Health Analytics and Data Visualization for Decision Support in the Infectious Diseases Domain: A pilot study

Don Roosan  1 , Guilherme Del Fiol  2 , Jorie Butler  3 , Yarden Livnat  4 , Jeanmarie Mayer  3 , Matthew Samore  2 , Makoto Jones  3 , Charlene Weir  2
Affiliations

Feasibility of Population Health Analytics and Data Visualization for Decision Support in the Infectious Diseases Domain: A pilot study

Don Roosan et al. Appl Clin Inform. .

Abstract

Objective: Big data or population-based information has the potential to reduce uncertainty in medicine by informing clinicians about individual patient care. The objectives of this study were: 1) to explore the feasibility of extracting and displaying population-based information from an actual clinical population's database records, 2) to explore specific design features for improving population display, 3) to explore perceptions of population information displays, and 4) to explore the impact of population information display on cognitive outcomes.

Methods: We used the Veteran's Affairs (VA) database to identify similar complex patients based on a similar complex patient case. Study outcomes measures were 1) preferences for population information display 2) time looking at the population display, 3) time to read the chart, and 4) appropriateness of plans with pre- and post-presentation of population data. Finally, we redesigned the population information display based on our findings from this study.

Results: The qualitative data analysis for preferences of population information display resulted in four themes: 1) trusting the big/population data can be an issue, 2) embedded analytics is necessary to explore patient similarities, 3) need for tools to control the view (overview, zoom and filter), and 4) different presentations of the population display can be beneficial to improve the display. We found that appropriateness of plans was at 60% for both groups (t9=-1.9; p=0.08), and overall time looking at the population information display was 2.3 minutes versus 3.6 minutes with experts processing information faster than non-experts (t8= -2.3, p=0.04).

Conclusion: A population database has great potential for reducing complexity and uncertainty in medicine to improve clinical care. The preferences identified for the population information display will guide future health information technology system designers for better and more intuitive display.

Keywords: Health information systems; big data; information display; population decision support systems; uncertainty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Population information display
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Viewing time for the population display (expert versus non-expert)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Redesigned Population-based information display.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Escaping the ehr trap — the future of health it. New England Journal of Medicine 2012; 366(24): 2240-2242. doi:doi:10.1056/NEJMp1203102. - PubMed
    1. Mitka M. Physicians cite problems with ehrs. JAMA 2014; 311(18): 1847–1847. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.5030.
    1. Wu HW, Davis PK, Bell DS. Advancing clinical decision support using lessons from outside of healthcare: An interdisciplinary systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12: 90 doi:10.1186/1472–6947–12–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Welch BM, Kawamoto K. Clinical decision support for genetically guided personalized medicine: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013; 20(2): 388–400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hemmerich JA, Elstein AS, Schwarze ML, Moliski EG, Dale W. Risk as feelings in the effect of patient outcomes on physicians’ future treatment decisions: A randomized trial and manipulation validation. Soc Sci Med 2012; 75(2): 367-376. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.020. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types