Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;10(5):ZC125-9.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17725.7844. Epub 2016 May 1.

Effectiveness of Peer Group and Conventional Method (Dentist) of Oral Health Education Programme Among 12-15 year Old School Children - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Effectiveness of Peer Group and Conventional Method (Dentist) of Oral Health Education Programme Among 12-15 year Old School Children - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Swathi Vangipuram et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Oral Health Education (OHE) in schools is routinely delivered by the dentist. Another approach which can be cost-effective, easily accessible and equally effective is the trained group of peer students.

Aim: The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of peer-led and conventional method (dentist-led), OHE on oral health status, oral health knowledge, attitude and practices among 12-15 year old government school children in Bengaluru South Zone-I at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.

Materials and methods: The study population comprised of 450 subjects, 150 each in peer, dentist and control group. At baseline, a pre-tested 14 item questionnaire was used to assess the existing oral health knowledge, attitude and oral hygiene practices of the subjects. Clinical examination included recording of plaque index and gingival index, by a pre-calibrated examiner. OHE was provided by the peer group and dentist (using power-point presentation, chalk and talk presentation, using charts, posters, booklets and tooth brushing demonstration models). Data was analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and Chi-square test.

Results: Both the peer-led and dentist-led OHE intervention were effective in improving oral health knowledge, attitude, oral hygiene practices and oral health status at three and six months when compared to control group. The adolescents in the peer-led group, however, exhibited statistically better oral health behavior than their counterparts in the dentist-led group and control group.

Conclusion: The two educator-led strategies (peer group and dentist) had a modest effect on the outcome variables included in the study, the results provide some evidence to show that the peer-led strategy may provide a feasible and almost equally effective alternative to the traditional dentist led strategy of oral health education.

Keywords: Adolescent; Health behavior; Oral education; Oral hygiene.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-1]:
[Table/Fig-1]:
Showing allocation of study participants according to CONSORT 2010.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stella Y.K, Petersen PE. Health- promoting schools: an opportunity for oral health promotion. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 2005;83(9):34–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jorgensen N, Petersen P.E. Promoting oral health of children through schools – Results from a WHO global survey 2012. Community Dental Health. 2013;30:204–18. - PubMed
    1. Brown LF. Research in dental health education and health promotion: a review of the literature. Health Education Quarterly. 1994;21:83–102. - PubMed
    1. Yazdani R, Miira M. School based oral health education to improve oral cleanliness and gingival health in adolescents in Tehran, Iran. Int J Ped Dent. 2009;19:274–81. - PubMed
    1. Kay E.J, Locker D. Is dental health education effective? A systematic review of current evidence. Community Dent Oral Epidemiology. 1996;24:231–35. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources