A Qualitative Study of the Experiences and Factors That Led Physicians to Be Lifelong Health Advocates
- PMID: 27438157
- PMCID: PMC5044810
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001316
A Qualitative Study of the Experiences and Factors That Led Physicians to Be Lifelong Health Advocates
Abstract
Purpose: Given the public's trust and the opportunities to observe and address social determinants of health, physicians are well suited to be health advocates, a key role in the CanMEDS physician competency framework. As some physicians find it difficult to fulfill this role, the authors explored the experiences and influences that led established physicians to be health advocates.
Method: The authors used a phenomenological approach to explore this topic. From March to August 2014, they interviewed 15 established physician health advocates, using a broad definition of health advocacy-that it extends beyond individual patient advocacy to address the root causes of systemic differences in health. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were coded and the data categorized into clusters of meaning, then into themes. Data analysis was conducted iteratively, with data collection continuing until no new information was gathered.
Results: Participants described the factors that contributed to the development of their health advocate identity (i.e., exposure to social injustice, upbringing, schooling, specific formative experiences) and those that facilitated their engagement in health advocacy work (i.e., mentors, training, systemic and organizational supports). They also highlighted how they continue in their role as lifelong advocates (i.e., continuous learning and improvement, self-reflection and self-reflexivity, collaboration, intrinsic satisfaction in the work).
Conclusions: Many factors allow physician health advocates to establish and sustain a commitment to improve the health of their patients and the broader population. Medical schools could use these findings to guide curriculum development related to teaching this physician competency.
Conflict of interest statement
Other disclosures: None reported.
Comment in
-
Beyond the Controversy About Advocacy.Acad Med. 2017 Apr;92(4):425. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001586. Acad Med. 2017. PMID: 28350590 No abstract available.
-
In Reply to Reardon et al.Acad Med. 2017 Apr;92(4):425-426. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001604. Acad Med. 2017. PMID: 28350591 No abstract available.
References
-
- Earnest MA, Wong SL, Federico SG. Perspective: Physician advocacy: What is it and how do we do it? Acad Med. 2010;85:63–67. - PubMed
-
- Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.
-
- Sherbino J, Bonnycastle D, Côte B, et al. The CanMEDS 2015 Health Advocate Expert Working Group Report. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2014.
-
- American Medical Association. Declaration of Professional Responsibility: Medicine’s Social Contract With Humanity. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2001. http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/ethics/decofprofessional.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2014. - PubMed
-
- ABIM Foundation, ACP-ASIM Foundation, European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:243–246. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials