How Can a Valid Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes Be Defined Without Patient Input?

Affiliations

¹ Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
² Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland2Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland3Department of Health Policy and Management, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Comment

Lisa M Kodadek et al. JAMA Surg. 2016.

. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):936-937.

doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1695.

¹ Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
² Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland2Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland3Department of Health Policy and Management, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

No abstract available

Comment on

Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery: Using a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders.
Pezold ML, Pusic AL, Cohen WA, Hollenberg JP, Butt Z, Flum DR, Temple LK. Pezold ML, et al. JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):930-936. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1640. JAMA Surg. 2016. PMID: 27437666 Free PMC article.