Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jul 20;17(1):330.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1450-x.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for small fiber neuropathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for small fiber neuropathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Bianca T A de Greef et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Small fiber neuropathy is the most common cause of neuropathic pain in peripheral neuropathies, with a minimum prevalence of 53/100,000. Patients experience excruciating pain, and currently available anti-neuropathic and other pain drugs do not relieve the pain substantially. Several open-label studies have suggested an immunological basis in small fiber neuropathy and have reported efficacy of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin. Therefore, immunological mechanisms conceivably may play a role in small fiber neuropathy. To date, no randomized controlled study with intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with small fiber neuropathy has been performed.

Methods/design: This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial in patients with idiopathic small fiber neuropathy. The primary objective is to investigate the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin versus placebo on pain alleviation. A 1-point change in the PI-NRS compared to baseline is considered the minimum clinically important difference. In the IVIg-treated group, we assume a response rate of approximately 60 % based on the criteria composed by the IMMPACT group for measurement of pain. Based on this, a sample size of 60 patients is needed. Eligible patients fulfilling the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to receive either intravenous immunoglobulin or placebo (0.9 % saline). The treatment regimen will start with a loading dose of 2 g/kg body weight over 2-4 consecutive days, followed by a maintenance dose of 1 g/kg body weight over 1-2 consecutive days given three times at a 3-week interval. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the percentage of responder subjects between the two treatment groups from the first randomization during the 12 weeks of treatment. A responder is defined as ≥ 1-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale improvement on the mean weekly peak pain relative to baseline. The secondary outcomes are pain intensity, pain qualities, other small fiber neuropathy-related complaints, daily and social functioning, as well as quality of life. In addition, safety assessments will be performed for adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory values outside the normal range. Responders during the 12-week treatment period will be followed during a 3-month extension phase.

Discussion: This is the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with idiopathic small fiber neuropathy. Positive findings will result in a new treatment option for small fiber neuropathy and support an immunological role in this condition.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02637700 . Registered on 16 December 2015.

Keywords: Immunology; Intravenous immunoglobulin; Painful neuropathy; Randomized controlled trial; Small fiber neuropathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic diagram representing overall study design and study visits Legend: IVIg = intravenous immunoglobulin, red triangles represent the treatment visits. The first treatment visit is spread out over 2-4 consecutive days, treatment visit 2-4 will consist of 1-2 consecutive days

References

    1. Peters MJ, Bakkers M, Merkies IS, Hoeijmakers JG, van Raak EP, Faber CG. Incidence and prevalence of small-fiber neuropathy: a survey in the Netherlands. Neurology. 2013;81(15):1356–60. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a8236e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gorson KC, Ropper AH. Idiopathic distal small fiber neuropathy. Acta Neurol Scand. 1995;92(5):376–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1995.tb00150.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoeijmakers JG, Faber CG, Lauria G, Merkies IS, Waxman SG. Small-fibre neuropathies-advances in diagnosis, pathophysiology and management. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8(7):369–79. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.97. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lauria G, Merkies IS, Faber CG. Small fibre neuropathy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25(5):542–9. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835804c5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakkers M, Faber CG, Hoeijmakers JG, Lauria G, Merkies IS. Small fibers, large impact: quality of life in small-fiber neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 2014;49(3):329–36. doi: 10.1002/mus.23910. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data