A head-to-head comparison among donor site morbidity after vascularized lymph node transfer: Pearls and pitfalls of a 6-year single center experience
- PMID: 27440739
- DOI: 10.1002/jso.24349
A head-to-head comparison among donor site morbidity after vascularized lymph node transfer: Pearls and pitfalls of a 6-year single center experience
Abstract
Between 2010 and 2016, 110 patients with extremity lymphedema underwent vascularized lymph node (VLN) transfer: groin (G-VLN = 20), supraclavicular (SC-VLN = 54), and right gastroepiploic (RGE-VLN = 36) open and laparoscopic approach. Herein, we discuss the pearls and pitfalls for VLN harvest and compare donor site morbidity and complications. Lymphatic leakage: G-VLN (n = 1) and SC-VLN (n = 1) and one hematoma: SC-VLN were found. Laparoscopic harvest of the RGE-VLN reduces donor site morbidity. However, surgeons experience is imperative to minimize donor site morbidity and complications. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:37-42. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: donor site morbidity; lymph node flap transfer; lymphaticovenous anastomosis; lymphedema; vascularized lymph node transfer.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor.J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;117(6):1344-1345. doi: 10.1002/jso.24958. Epub 2018 Feb 23. J Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29473953 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
