Performance of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score and a Simplified Finnish Diabetes Risk Score in a Community-Based, Cross-Sectional Programme for Screening of Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dysglycaemia in Madrid, Spain: The SPREDIA-2 Study
- PMID: 27441722
- PMCID: PMC4956208
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158489
Performance of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score and a Simplified Finnish Diabetes Risk Score in a Community-Based, Cross-Sectional Programme for Screening of Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dysglycaemia in Madrid, Spain: The SPREDIA-2 Study
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the performance of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) and a simplified FINDRISC score (MADRISC) in screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (UT2DM) and dysglycaemia.
Methods: A population-based, cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out with participants with UT2DM, ranged between 45-74 years and lived in two districts in the north of metropolitan Madrid (Spain). The FINDRISC and MADRISC scores were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve method (ROC-AUC). Four different gold standards were used for UT2DM and any dysglycaemia, as follows: fasting plasma glucose (FPG), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), HbA1c, and OGTT or HbA1c. Dysglycaemia and UT2DM were defined according to American Diabetes Association criteria.
Results: The study population comprised 1,426 participants (832 females and 594 males) with a mean age of 62 years (SD = 6.1). When HbA1c or OGTT criteria were used, the prevalence of UT2DM was 7.4% (10.4% in men and 5.2% in women; p<0.01) and the FINDRISC ROC-AUC for UT2DM was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.74). The optimal cut-off point was ≥13 (sensitivity = 63.8%, specificity = 65.1%). The ROC-AUC of MADRISC was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.81) with ≥13 as the optimal cut-off point (sensitivity = 84.8%, specificity = 54.6%). FINDRISC score ≥12 for detecting any dysglycaemia offered the best cut-off point when HbA1c alone or OGTT and HbA1c were the criteria used.
Conclusions: FINDRISC proved to be a useful instrument in screening for dysglycaemia and UT2DM. In the screening of UT2DM, the simplified MADRISC performed as well as FINDRISC.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score as a screening tool for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and dysglycaemia among early middle-aged adults in a large-scale European cohort. The Feel4Diabetes-study.Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Apr;150:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Feb 20. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019. PMID: 30796939
-
Evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) for diabetes screening in occupational health care.Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28(3):587-91. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00407. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015. PMID: 26190733
-
Translation and performance of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score for detecting undiagnosed diabetes and dysglycaemia in the Indonesian population.PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0269853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269853. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35862370 Free PMC article.
-
Transculturalizing Diabetes Prevention in Latin America.Ann Glob Health. 2017 May-Aug;83(3-4):432-443. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 24. Ann Glob Health. 2017. PMID: 29221516 Review.
-
FINDRISC in Latin America: a systematic review of diagnosis and prognosis models.BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Apr;8(1):e001169. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001169. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020. PMID: 32327446 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
External Validation of Finnish Diabetes Risk Score and Australian Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool Prediction Models to Identify People with Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-sectional Study in Iran.Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Oct 31;20(4):e127114. doi: 10.5812/ijem-127114. eCollection 2022 Oct. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2022. PMID: 36714189 Free PMC article.
-
Can Self-Determination Explain Dietary Patterns Among Adults at Risk of or with Type 2 Diabetes? A Cross-Sectional Study in Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Areas in Stockholm.Nutrients. 2020 Feb 27;12(3):620. doi: 10.3390/nu12030620. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32120791 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Glycemic variability and all-cause mortality in a large prospective southern European cohort of patients with differences in glycemic status.PLoS One. 2022 Jul 25;17(7):e0271632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271632. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35877766 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a new diabetes index for the risk classification of present and new-onset diabetes: multicohort study.Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 3;11(1):15748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95341-8. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34344964 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting work disability among people with chronic conditions: a prospective cohort study.Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 18;13(1):6334. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33120-3. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37072462 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al.; Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001;344(18):1343–50. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases