Predicting Persistent Back Symptoms by Psychosocial Risk Factors: Validity Criteria for the ÖMPSQ and the HKF-R 10 in Germany
- PMID: 27442020
- PMCID: PMC4956238
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158850
Predicting Persistent Back Symptoms by Psychosocial Risk Factors: Validity Criteria for the ÖMPSQ and the HKF-R 10 in Germany
Abstract
Objective: 10% of all individuals in Germany develop persistent symptoms due to nonspecific back pain (NSBP) causing up to 90% of direct and indirect expenses for health care systems. Evidence indicates a strong relationship between chronic nonspecific back pain and psychosocial risk factors. The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ) and the German Heidelberger Kurzfragebogen Rückenschmerz (HKF-R 10) are deemed valid in prediction of persistent pain, functional loss or amount of sick leave. This study provides and discusses validity criteria for these questionnaires using ROC-curve analyses. Quality measurements included sensitivity and specificity, likelihood-ratio related test-efficiencies and clinical utility in regard to predictive values.
Methods: 265 patients recruited from primary and secondary care units completed both questionnaires during the same timeframe. From the total, 133 patients returned a 6-month follow-up questionnaire to assess the validity criteria for outcomes of pain, function and sick leave.
Results: Based on heterogeneous cut-offs for the ÖMPSQ, sensitivity and specificity were moderate for outcome of pain (72%/75%). Very high sensitivity was observed for function (97%/57%) and high specificity for sick leave (63%/85%). The latter also applied to the HKF-R 10 (pain 50%/84%). Proportions between sensitivity and specificity were unbalanced except for the ÖMPSQ outcome of pain. Likelihood-ratios and positive predictive values ranged from low to moderate.
Conclusion: Although the ÖMPSQ may be considered useful in identification of long-term functional loss or pain, over- and underestimation of patients at risk of chronic noncspecific back pain led to limited test-efficiencies and clinical utility for both questionnaires. Further studies are required to quantify the predictive validity of both questionnaires in Germany.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the Swedish STarT Back Screening Tool and the Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in patients with acute or subacute back and neck pain.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 21;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1449-9. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017. PMID: 28222707 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of sickness absenteeism, disability pension and sickness presenteeism among employees with back pain.J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Jun;24(2):278-86. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9454-9. J Occup Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 23771777 Free PMC article.
-
Construct validity and reliability of Finnish version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 24. Scand J Pain. 2016. PMID: 28850521
-
Comparison between the STarT Back Screening Tool and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Which tool for what purpose? A semi-systematic review.Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 May;62(3):178-188. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Oct 19. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019. PMID: 30342997 Review.
-
[Psychosocial risk factors for chronic back pain in the general population and in competitive sports : From theory to clinical screening-a review from the MiSpEx network].Schmerz. 2018 Aug;32(4):259-273. doi: 10.1007/s00482-018-0307-5. Schmerz. 2018. PMID: 29946960 Review. German.
Cited by
-
The role of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale in the emergency department: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Open Access Emerg Med. 2019 Jul 17;11:147-159. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S178544. eCollection 2019. Open Access Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 31410071 Free PMC article.
-
[Effectiveness of a risk-tailored short intervention to prevent chronic low back pain : A cluster-randomized study in general practice].Schmerz. 2019 Jun;33(3):226-235. doi: 10.1007/s00482-019-0362-6. Schmerz. 2019. PMID: 30796580 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol.BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e042792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042792. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33472786 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Dram Score as a Predictor of Poor Postoperative Outcome in Spine Surgery.J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 26;9(12):3825. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123825. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 33255911 Free PMC article.
-
Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies.Pain Rep. 2019 Sep 11;4(5):e775. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000775. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct. Pain Rep. 2019. PMID: 31875182 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kendall NA, Linton SJ, Main CJ. Guide to Assessing Psychosocial Yellow Flags in Acute Low Back Pain: Risk Factors for Long-Term Disability and Work Loss: Wellington, New Zealand: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee; 1997. 1997.
-
- Pfingsten M, Korb J, Hasenbring M. Psychologische Mechanismen der Chronifizierung—Konsequenzen für die Prävention In Kröner-Herwig B, editor. Schmerzpsychotherapie: Grundlagen-Diagnostik-Krankheitsbilder-Behandlung; [komplett aktualisiert]. 7th ed Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.
-
- Turk DC. The role of demographic and psychosocial factors in transition from acute to chronic pain: IASP Press; 1997.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical