Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:9431385.
doi: 10.1155/2016/9431385. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

Predictors of Poor Outcomes in Critically Ill Adults with Hematologic Malignancy

Affiliations

Predictors of Poor Outcomes in Critically Ill Adults with Hematologic Malignancy

Marion Cornish et al. Can Respir J. 2016.

Abstract

Background. Patients with hematologic malignancy (HM) often require intensive care unit (ICU) admission due to organ failure through disease progression or treatment-related complications. Objective. To determine mortality and prognostic variables in adult patients with HM who were admitted to ICU. Methods. Structured chart review of all adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with HM admitted to ICU of a Canadian tertiary care hospital between 2004 and 2014. Outcome measures included mortality (ICU, 30-day, 60-day, and 12-month). Logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of mortality. Results. Overall, there were 206 cases of HM admitted to the ICU during the study (mean age: 51.3 ± 13.6 years; 60% male). Median stay was 3 days, with 14.1% requiring prolonged ICU admission. ICU mortality was 45.6% and increased to 59.2% at 30 days, 62.6% at 60 days, and 74.3% at 12 months. Predictors of increased ICU mortality included mechanical ventilation requirement and vasopressor therapy requirement, while admission to ICU postoperatively and having myeloma were associated with decreased mortality. Conclusions. Patients admitted to ICU with HM have high mortality (45.6%), which increased to 74.3% at 1 year. Analysis of multiple variables identified critical illness, postsurgical admission, and myeloma as predictors of patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of study participants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brunet F., Lanore J. J., Dhainaut J. F., et al. Is intensive care justified for patients with haematological malignancies? Intensive Care Medicine. 1990;16(5):291–297. doi: 10.1007/bf01706352. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Townsend W. M., Holroyd A., Pearce R., et al. Improved intensive care unit survival for critically ill allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients following reduced intensity conditioning. British Journal of Haematology. 2013;161(4):578–586. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12294. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ñamendys-Silva S. A., González-Herrera M. O., García-Guillén F. J., Texcocano-Becerra J., Herrera-Gómez A. Outcome of critically ill patients with hematological malignancies. Annals of Hematology. 2013;92(5):699–705. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1675-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azoulay E., Pène F., Darmon M., et al. Managing critically Ill hematology patients: time to think differently. Blood Reviews. 2015;29(6):359–367. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2015.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hill Q. A. Intensify, resuscitate or palliate: decision making in the critically ill patient with haematological malignancy. Blood Reviews. 2010;24(1):17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2009.10.002. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources