Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun 30:7:1019.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01019. eCollection 2016.

Progress and Challenges in Microalgal Biodiesel Production

Affiliations
Review

Progress and Challenges in Microalgal Biodiesel Production

Nirupama Mallick et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed a tremendous impetus on biofuel research due to the irreversible diminution of fossil fuel reserves for enormous demands of transportation vis-a-vis escalating emissions of green house gasses (GHGs) into the atmosphere. With an imperative need of CO2 reduction and considering the declining status of crude oil, governments in various countries have not only diverted substantial funds for biofuel projects but also have introduced incentives to vendors that produce biofuels. Currently, biodiesel production from microalgal biomass has drawn an immense importance with the potential to exclude high-quality agricultural land use and food safe-keeping issues. Moreover, microalgae can grow in seawater or wastewater and microalgal oil can exceed 50-60% (dry cell weight) as compared with some best agricultural oil crops of only 5-10% oil content. Globally, microalgae are the highest biomass producers and neutral lipid accumulators contending any other terrestrial oil crops. However, there remain many hurdles in each and every step, starting from strain selection and lipid accumulation/yield, algae mass cultivation followed by the downstream processes such as harvesting, drying, oil extraction, and biodiesel conversion (transesterification), and overall, the cost of production. Isolation and screening of oleaginous microalgae is one pivotal important upstream factor which should be addressed according to the need of freshwater or marine algae with a consideration that wild-type indigenous isolate can be the best suited for the laboratory to large scale exploitation. Nowadays, a large number of literature on microalgal biodiesel production are available, but none of those illustrate a detailed step-wise description with the pros and cons of the upstream and downstream processes of biodiesel production from microalgae. Specifically, harvesting and drying constitute more than 50% of the total production costs; however, there are quite a less number of detailed study reports available. In this review, a pragmatic and critical analysis was tried to put forward with the on-going researches on isolation and screening of oleaginous microalgae, microalgal large scale cultivation, biomass harvesting, drying, lipid extraction and finally biodiesel production.

Keywords: biodiesel; drying; harvesting; lipid yield; mass cultivation; microalgae; strain selection; transesterification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A laboratory model showing Electro-Coagulation–Flocculation of microalgae.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Schematic view of ‘bridging and patching’ mechanism [reproduced with permission from (Salim et al., 2011)]. ©Springer (2011).

References

    1. Agwa O. K., Ibe S. N., Abu G. O. (2012). Economically effective potential of Chlorella sp. for biomass and lipid production. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Res. 2 35–45.
    1. Ahmad I., Sharma A. K., Daniell H., Kumar S. (2015). Altered lipid composition and enhanced lipid production in green microalga by introduction of brassica diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2. Plant Biotechnol. J. 13 540–550. 10.1111/pbi.12278 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bagchi S. K., Rao P. S., Mallick N. (2015). Development of an oven drying protocol to improve biodiesel production for an indigenous chlorophycean microalga Scenedesmus sp. Bioresour. Technol. 180 207–213. 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.092 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bilad M. R., Discart V., Vandamme D., Foubert I., Muylaert K., Vankelecom I. F. (2013). Harvesting microalgal biomass using a magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) system: filtration performance and energy consumption. Bioresour. Technol. 138 329–338. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.175 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bilanovic D., Shelef G. (1988). Flocculation of microalgae with cationic polymers -effects of medium salinity. Biomass 17 65–76. 10.1016/0144-4565(88)90071-6 - DOI