Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:9564529.
doi: 10.1155/2016/9564529. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

Safety of Digestive Endoscopy following Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Safety of Digestive Endoscopy following Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Alastair Dorreen et al. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016.

Abstract

Background. The safety of endoscopy after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is poorly characterized. We thus performed a systematic review assessing the safety of endoscopy following ACS. Methods. Searches in EMBASE, Medline, and Web of Science identified articles for inclusion. Data abstraction was completed by two independent reviewers. Results. Fourteen retrospective studies yielded 1178 patients (mean 71.3 years, 59.0% male) having suffered an ACS before endoscopy. Patients underwent 1188 endoscopies primarily to investigate suspected gastrointestinal bleeding (81.2%). Overall, 810 EGDs (68.2%), 191 colonoscopies (16.1%), 100 sigmoidoscopies (8.4%), 64 PEGs (5.4%), and 22 ERCPs (1.9%) were performed 9.0 ± 5.2 days after ACS, showing principally ulcer disease (25.1%; 95% CI 22.2-28.3%) and normal findings (22.9%; 95% CI 20.1-26.0%). Overall, 108 peri- and postprocedural complications occurred (9.1%; 95% CI 7.6-10.9%), with hypotension (24.1%; 95% CI 17.0-32.9%), arrhythmias (8.1%; 95% CI 4.5-18.1%), and repeat ACS (6.5%; 95% CI 3.1-12.8%) as the most frequent. All-cause mortality was 8.1% (95% CI 6.3-10.4%), with 4 deaths attributed to endoscopy (<24 hours after ACS, 3.7% of all complications; 95% CI 1.5-9.1%). Conclusion. A significant proportion of possibly endoscopy-related negative outcomes occur following ACS. Further studies are required to better characterize indications, patient selection, and appropriate timing of endoscopy in this cohort.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
STROBE diagram.

References

    1. Brieger D., Fox K. A. A., FitzGerald G., et al. Predicting freedom from clinical events in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart. 2009;95(11):888–894. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.153387. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roe M. T., Messenger J. C., Weintraub W. S., et al. Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;56(4):254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cappell M. S., Iacovone F. M., Jr. The safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy after recent myocardial infarction: a study of 28 patients and 40 controls at four university teaching hospitals. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1996;91(8):1599–1603. - PubMed
    1. Montalvo R. D., Lee M. Risks of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Endoscopy. 1996;28(3, article 329) doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005473. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Ebrahim F., Khan K. J., Alhazzani W., et al. Safety of esophagogastroduodenoscopy within 30 days of myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study from a canadian tertiary centre. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012;26(3):151–154. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources