Safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stents assessed at 1-year follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies
- PMID: 27448538
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.101
Safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stents assessed at 1-year follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies
Abstract
Background: The Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) was developed to address long-term safety issues of metallic drug-eluting stents. However, it may be associated with an increased event risk during the first year.
Methods: A systematic literature search was performed (in MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, and scientific meeting abstracts) to identify studies that compared BVS and cobalt-chromium durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (EES). For randomized clinical trials and non-randomized propensity score matched studies that reported 1-year outcome data, fixed/random-effects models were used to generate pooled estimates of outcomes, presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95%-confidence intervals (CI).
Results: The 1-year follow-up data of 6 trials with 5588 patients were analyzed. A device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE - cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR)) was reached by 308 BVS or EES patients (195/3253 vs. 113/2315). Meta-analysis showed that patients who received BVS had an increased risk of MI (4.3% vs. 2.3%; OR:1.63, 95%-CI: 1.18-2.25, p<0.01) and definite-or-probable scaffold thrombosis (1.3% vs. 0.6%; OR:2.10, 95%-CI: 1.13-3.87, p=0.02). However, there was no significant between-group difference in risk of DOCE (6.0% vs. 4.9%; OR:1.19, 95%-CI: 0.94-1.52, p=0.16), cardiac death (0.8% vs. 0.7%; OR:1.14, 95%-CI: 0.54-2.39, p=0.73), or TLR (2.5% vs. 2.5%; OR: 0.98, 95%-CI:0.69-1.40, p=0.92).
Conclusions: During the first year of follow-up, patients treated with BVS had a higher incidence of MI and scaffold thrombosis. The risk of DOCE was not significantly different. As BVS may pay off later, future robust data on long-term clinical outcome will be of paramount importance.
Keywords: Biodegradable device; Bioresorbable vascular scaffold; Everolimus-eluting stent; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Scaffold thrombosis; Stent thrombosis.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Bioresorbable stent thrombosis, lactic acid release and Kounis syndrome.Int J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 15;247:15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.131. Int J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28916055 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Letter to the Editor entitled: "Bioresorbable stent thrombosis, lactic acid release and Kounis syndrome".Int J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 15;247:16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.021. Int J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28916056 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy.Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):760-772. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31470-8. Epub 2017 Jul 18. Lancet. 2017. PMID: 28732815
-
Mid- and Long-Term Outcome Comparisons of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Nov 7;167(9):642-654. doi: 10.7326/M17-1101. Epub 2017 Oct 10. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 29049539
-
Stent Thrombosis With Drug-Eluting Stents and Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Evidence From a Network Meta-Analysis of 147 Trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 27;9(12):1203-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.038. Epub 2016 Jun 1. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27262860
-
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 7;164(11):752-63. doi: 10.7326/M16-0006. Epub 2016 Apr 5. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27042809
-
Late thrombotic events after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 1;38(33):2559-2566. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx155. Eur Heart J. 2017. PMID: 28430908
Cited by
-
Consensus Document ANMCO/ANCE/ARCA/GICR-IACPR/GISE/SICOA: Long-term Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Eur Heart J Suppl. 2018 May;20(Suppl F):F1-F74. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suy019. Epub 2018 May 31. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2018. PMID: 29867293 Free PMC article.
-
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Interventional Neuroradiology.Clin Neuroradiol. 2018 Dec;28(4):585-592. doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0609-5. Epub 2017 Jul 26. Clin Neuroradiol. 2018. PMID: 28748256
-
Management of ischemic coronary disease in patients receiving chemotherapy: an uncharted clinical challenge.Future Cardiol. 2017 May;13(3):247-257. doi: 10.2217/fca-2017-0002. Epub 2017 Jun 1. Future Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28570141 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Coronary Aneurysm Formation After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation Resulting in Acute Myocardial Infarction.Am J Case Rep. 2017 May 17;18:541-548. doi: 10.12659/ajcr.903529. Am J Case Rep. 2017. PMID: 28512285 Free PMC article.
-
Absorb® bioresorbable scaffold in "established" versus "off-label" coronary lesions: 5-year data from the GABI-R® registry.Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Aug;114(8):1084-1094. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02707-3. Epub 2025 Jun 30. Clin Res Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 40586899 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials