Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec;21(12):1483-1491.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0051. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

Recommendations for the Prophylactic Management of Skin Reactions Induced by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Patients With Solid Tumors

Affiliations
Review

Recommendations for the Prophylactic Management of Skin Reactions Induced by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Patients With Solid Tumors

Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz et al. Oncologist. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

: Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an established treatment that extends patient survival across a variety of tumor types. EGFR inhibitors fall into two main categories: anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab and panitumumab, and first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib. Skin reactions are the most common EGFR inhibitor-attributable adverse event, resulting in papulopustular (acneiform) eruptions that can be painful and debilitating, and which may potentially have a negative impact on patients' quality of life and social functioning, as well as a negative impact on treatment duration. Shortened treatment duration can, in turn, compromise antineoplastic efficacy. Similarly, appropriate management of skin reactions is dependent on their accurate grading; however, conventional means for grading skin reactions are inadequate, particularly within the context of clinical trials. Treating a skin reaction only once it occurs (reactive treatment strategies) may not be the most effective management approach; instead, prophylactic approaches may be preferable. Indeed, we support the viewpoint that prophylactic management of skin reactions should be recommended for all patients treated with EGFR inhibitors. Appropriate prophylactic management could effectively reduce the severity of skin reactions in patients treated with EGFR inhibitors and therefore has the potential to directly benefit patients and improve drug adherence. Accordingly, here we review published and still-emerging data, and provide practical and evidence-based recommendations and algorithms regarding the optimal prophylactic management of EGFR inhibitor-attributable skin reactions.

Implications for practice: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors extend patient survival across a variety of tumor types. The most common EGFR inhibitor-attributable adverse events are skin reactions. Prophylactic-rather than reactive-management of skin reactions for all patients receiving EGFR inhibitors should be recommended because appropriate prophylaxis could effectively reduce the severity of skin reactions; thus, the derivation of highly effective prophylactic strategies has the potential to directly benefit patients. Accordingly, a review of the available data leads to practical and evidence-based recommendations and algorithms regarding the optimal prophylactic management of EGFR inhibitor-attributable skin reactions.

Keywords: Algorithms; EGFR inhibitors; Prophylactic care; Skin reactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Recommendations for the prophylactic management of skin reactions induced by EGFR inhibitors: general basic skin care recommendations for the early phase (A) and specific prophylaxis recommendations for acne-like rash (B), starting with the first cetuximab dose. Level of evidence and grades of recommendations reflect the following scoring system: Levels of evidence are as follows: IA, evidence from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; IB, evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial; IIA, evidence from at least one controlled study without randomization; IIB, evidence from at least one other type of quasi-experimental study; III, evidence from nonexperimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies, and case-control studies; and IV, evidence from expert committee reports or opinions or clinical experience of respected authorities, or both. Grades of recommendation are as follows: A, directly based on level I evidence; B, directly based on level II evidence or extrapolated recommendations from level I evidence; C, directly based on level III evidence or extrapolated recommendations from level I or II evidence; and D, directly based on level IV evidence or extrapolated recommendations from level I, II, or III evidence. Abbreviations: DAC, Deutscher Arzneimittel-Codex; LOE, level of evidence.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proposed algorithm for managing patients who experience skin reactions in response to EGFR inhibitor-based therapy. Abbreviations: DAC, Deutscher Arzneimittel-Codex; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

References

    1. Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408–1417. - PubMed
    1. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:567–578. - PubMed
    1. Pirker R, Pereira JR, Szczesna A, et al. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): An open-label randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1525–1531. - PubMed
    1. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1960–1966. - PubMed
    1. Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1116–1127. - PubMed