Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness
- PMID: 27450504
- PMCID: PMC5031729
- DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z
Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness
Abstract
Background People diagnosed with serious mental illnesses (SMIs) such as schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder are frequently treated with antipsychotics. National guidance advises the use of shared decision-making (SDM) in antipsychotic prescribing. There is currently little data on the opinions of health professionals on the role of SDM. Objective To explore the views and experiences of UK mental health pharmacists regarding the use of SDM in antipsychotic prescribing in people diagnosed with SMI. Setting The study was conducted by interviewing secondary care mental health pharmacists in the UK to obtain qualitative data. Methods Semi-structured interviews were recorded. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted using the method of constant comparison. Main outcome measure Themes evolving from mental health pharmacists on SDM in relation to antipsychotic prescribing in people with SMI. Results Thirteen mental health pharmacists were interviewed. SDM was perceived to be linked to positive clinical outcomes including adherence, service user satisfaction and improved therapeutic relations. Despite more prescribers and service users supporting SDM, it was not seen as being practised as widely as it could be; this was attributed to a number of barriers, most predominantly issues surrounding service user's lacking capacity to engage in SDM and time pressures on clinical staff. The need for greater effort to work around the issues, engage service users and adopt a more inter-professional approach was conveyed. Conclusion The mental health pharmacists support SDM for antipsychotic prescribing, believing that it improves outcomes. However, barriers are seen to limit implementation. More research is needed into overcoming the barriers and measuring the benefits of SDM, along with exploring a more inter-professional approach to SDM.
Keywords: Antipsychotic prescribing; Mental health pharmacy; Shared decision making; United Kingdom.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest were identified.
Similar articles
-
Exploring the potential implementation of a tool to enhance shared decision making (SDM) in mental health services in the United Kingdom: a qualitative exploration of the views of service users, carers and professionals.Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Jun 28;11:42. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0149-z. eCollection 2017. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017. PMID: 28670338 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring service users', carers' and professionals' perspectives and experiences of current antipsychotic prescribing: A qualitative study.Chronic Illn. 2017 Dec;13(4):275-287. doi: 10.1177/1742395317694223. Epub 2017 Feb 20. Chronic Illn. 2017. PMID: 29119866
-
Consultant psychiatrists' experiences of and attitudes towards shared decision making in antipsychotic prescribing, a qualitative study.BMC Psychiatry. 2014 May 1;14:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-127. BMC Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 24886121 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of shared decision-making in severe mental illness: An integrative review.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;27(2):103-127. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12558. Epub 2019 Dec 6. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020. PMID: 31444919
-
A meta-ethnography of shared decision-making in mental health care from the perspective of staff and service users.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11540-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39334231 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis.Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020 Oct;17(4):e12365. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12365. Epub 2020 Aug 5. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020. PMID: 32761783 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb;60(2):292-307. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01170-6. Epub 2023 Aug 7. Community Ment Health J. 2024. PMID: 37550559 Free PMC article.
-
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living with Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review.Schizophr Bull. 2025 Jul 7;51(4):916-932. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf058. Schizophr Bull. 2025. PMID: 40396340 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A realist review of medication optimisation of community dwelling service users with serious mental illness.BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Dec 13;34(1):40-52. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016615. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024. PMID: 38071586 Free PMC article. Review.
-
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living With Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review (Part 2-Designing SDM Interventions: Optimizing Design and Local Implementation).Schizophr Bull. 2025 Jul 7;51(4):932-948. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf059. Schizophr Bull. 2025. PMID: 40396338 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Mental Health Foundation. What are mental health problems? n.d. http://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/help-information/an-introduction-to-menta.... Accessed 24 Nov 2015.
-
- Hafal. Mental Health in Wales. n.d. http://www.mentalhealthwales.net/mhw/whatis.php. Accessed 9 Oct 2015.
-
- NICE. Clinical guidelines 76: medicines adherence involving patients in decisions about prescribed medications and supporting adherence available. 2009. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg76/chapter/introduction Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical