Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Jan;112(1):51-62.
doi: 10.1111/add.13535. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis of continuous associations

Michael Amlung  1 , Lana Vedelago  1 , John Acker  2 , Iris Balodis  1 , James MacKillop  1   3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis of continuous associations

Michael Amlung et al. Addiction. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: To synthesize continuous associations between delayed reward discounting (DRD) and both addiction severity and quantity-frequency (QF); to examine moderators of these relationships; and to investigate publication bias.

Methods: Meta-analysis of published studies examining continuous associations between DRD and addictive behaviors. Published, peer-reviewed studies on addictive behaviors (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, stimulants, opiates and gambling) were identified via PubMed, MEDLINE and PsycInfo. Studies were restricted to DRD measures of monetary gains. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using Pearson's r as the effect size. Publication bias was evaluated using fail-safe N, Begg-Mazumdar and Egger's tests, meta-regression of publication year and effect size and imputation of missing studies.

Results: The primary meta-analysis revealed a small magnitude effect size that was highly significant (r = 0.14, P < 10-14 ). Significantly larger effect sizes were observed for studies examining severity compared with QF (P = 0.01), but not between the type of addictive behavior (P = 0.30) or DRD assessment (P = 0.90). Indices of publication bias suggested a modest impact of unpublished findings.

Conclusions: Delayed reward discounting is associated robustly with continuous measures of addiction severity and quantity-frequency. This relation is generally robust across type of addictive behavior and delayed reward discounting assessment modality.

Keywords: Addiction; behavioral economics; delayed reward discounting; meta-analysis; publication bias; quantity-frequency; severity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) inclusion flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bickel WK, Johnson MW, Koffarnus MN, et al. The behavioral economics of substance use disorders: reinforcement pathologies and their repair. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:641–77. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153724. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vuchinich RE, Heather N. Choice, Behavioural Economics and Addiction. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2003.
    1. Madden GJ, Bickel WK. Impulsivity: The Behavioral and Neurological Science of Discounting. American Psychological Association; Washington, D.C: 2009.
    1. Cyders MA, Coskunpinar A. Measurement of constructs using self-report and behavioral lab tasks: Is there overlap in nomothetic span and construct representation for impulsivity? Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:965–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mackillop J, Miller JD, Fortune E, et al. Multidimensional examination of impulsivity in relation to disordered gambling. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014;22:176–85. doi: 10.1037/a0035874. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types