American Osteopathic Association Guidelines for Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) for Patients With Low Back Pain
- PMID: 27455103
- DOI: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.107
American Osteopathic Association Guidelines for Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) for Patients With Low Back Pain
Abstract
Background: Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a distinctive modality commonly used by osteopathic physicians to complement conventional management of musculoskeletal disorders, including those that cause low back pain (LBP). Osteopathic manipulative treatment is defined in the Glossary of Osteopathic Terminology as "The therapeutic application of manually guided forces by an osteopathic physician (U.S. Usage) to improve physiologic function and/or support homeostasis that has been altered by somatic dysfunction. OMT employs a variety of techniques" (eAppendix). Somatic dysfunction is defined as "Impaired or altered function of related components of the somatic (body framework) system: skeletal, arthrodial and myofascial structures, and their related vascular, lymphatic, and neural elements. Somatic dysfunction is treatable using osteopathic manipulative treatment." These guidelines update the AOA guidelines for osteopathic physicians to utilize OMT for patients with nonspecific acute or chronic LBP published in 2010 on the National Guideline Clearinghouse.1 METHODS: This update process commenced with literature searches that included electronic databases, personal contact with key researchers of OMT and low back pain, and Internet search engines. Early in the process, the Task Force on the Low Back Pain Clinical Practice Guidelines discovered the 2014 systematic literature review conducted by Franke et al2; this study serves as the basis for this updated guideline and further builds upon the literature used to support the previous guidelines. Findings from other eligible studies published after the search parameters of the Franke et al systematic review were also incorporated.
Results: The authors of the systematic review identified 307 studies. Thirty-one were evaluated and 16 were excluded. Of the 15 studies included in the review, 6 were retrieved from Germany, 5 from the United States, 2 from the United Kingdom, and 2 from Italy. Two additional studies published after the Franke et al review were also included. Osteopathic manipulative treatment significantly reduces pain and improves functional status in patients, including pregnant and postpartum women, with nonspecific acute and chronic LBP. Franke et al found that in acute and chronic nonspecific LBP, moderate-quality evidence suggested that OMT had a significant effect on pain relief (mean difference [MD], -12.91; 95% CI, -20.00 to -5.82) and functional status (standard mean difference [SMD], -0.36; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.14). More specifically, in chronic nonspecific LBP, the evidence suggested a significant difference in favor of OMT regarding pain (MD, -14.93; 95% CI, -25.18 to -4.68) and functional status (SMD, -0.32; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.07). When examining nonspecific LBP in pregnancy, low-quality evidence suggested a significant difference in favor of OMT for pain (MD, -23.01; 95% CI, -44.13 to -1.88) and functional status (SMD, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.36 to -0.23). Conversely for nonspecific LBP postpartum, Franke et al found that moderate-quality evidence suggested a significant difference in favor of OMT for pain (MD, -41.85; 95% CI, -49.43 to -34.27) and functional status (SMD, -1.78; 95% CI, -2.21 to -1.35).2 CONCLUSION: The conclusions of Franke et al further strengthen the findings that OMT reduces LBP. In a 2005 systematic review conducted by Licciardone et al3 and the basis of the LBP guidelines published in 2010, it was determined that OMT reduces pain more than expected from placebo effects alone, and these results had the potential to last beyond the first year of treatment. Franke et al specifically stated that clinically relevant effects of OMT were found for reducing pain and improving functional status in patients with acute and chronic nonspecific LBP and for LBP in pregnant and postpartum women 3 months after treatment. Larger randomized controlled trials with robust comparison groups are needed to further validate the effects of OMT on LBP. In addition, more research is needed to understand the mechanics of OMT and its short- and long-term effects, as well as the cost-effectiveness of such treatment.
Similar articles
-
American Osteopathic Association guidelines for osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for patients with low back pain.J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010 Nov;110(11):653-66. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010. PMID: 21135197
-
Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Aug 30;15:286. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-286. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014. PMID: 25175885 Free PMC article.
-
Osteopathic manipulative treatment for low back and pelvic girdle pain during and after pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Oct;21(4):752-762. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 31. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017. PMID: 29037623
-
Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment vs Sham Treatment on Activity Limitations in Patients With Nonspecific Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 1;181(5):620-630. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0005. JAMA Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33720272 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Osteopathic manual treatment in patients with diabetes mellitus and comorbid chronic low back pain: subgroup results from the OSTEOPATHIC Trial.J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Jun;113(6):468-78. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23739758 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Chronic pain outcomes among patients treated by osteopathic vs. allopathic physicians: a 36-month follow-up study.J Osteopath Med. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1515/jom-2025-0037. Online ahead of print. J Osteopath Med. 2025. PMID: 40418798
-
Valid and Invalid Indications for Osteopathic Interventions: A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Practices and French Healthcare Society Recommendations.Cureus. 2023 Nov 29;15(11):e49674. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49674. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38161897 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A systematic review using the AGREE II instrument.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):970. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05827-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 33092579 Free PMC article.
-
Morphological signs of connective tissue dysplasia as predictors of frequent post-exercise musculoskeletal disorders.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Oct 8;21(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03698-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020. PMID: 33032568 Free PMC article.
-
More than one third of clinical practice guidelines on low back pain overlap in AGREE II appraisals. Research wasted?BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01621-w. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022. PMID: 35790902 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous