Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 26:16:635.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3307-3.

Too much sitting and all-cause mortality: is there a causal link?

Affiliations

Too much sitting and all-cause mortality: is there a causal link?

Stuart J H Biddle et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Sedentary behaviours (time spent sitting, with low energy expenditure) are associated with deleterious health outcomes, including all-cause mortality. Whether this association can be considered causal has yet to be established. Using systematic reviews and primary studies from those reviews, we drew upon Bradford Hill's criteria to consider the likelihood that sedentary behaviour in epidemiological studies is likely to be causally related to all-cause (premature) mortality.

Methods: Searches for systematic reviews on sedentary behaviours and all-cause mortality yielded 386 records which, when judged against eligibility criteria, left eight reviews (addressing 17 primary studies) for analysis. Exposure measures included self-reported total sitting time, TV viewing time, and screen time. Studies included comparisons of a low-sedentary reference group with several higher sedentary categories, or compared the highest versus lowest sedentary behaviour groups. We employed four Bradford Hill criteria: strength of association, consistency, temporality, and dose-response. Evidence supporting causality at the level of each systematic review and primary study was judged using a traffic light system depicting green for causal evidence, amber for mixed or inconclusive evidence, and red for no evidence for causality (either evidence of no effect or no evidence reported).

Results: The eight systematic reviews showed evidence for consistency (7 green) and temporality (6 green), and some evidence for strength of association (4 green). There was no evidence for a dose-response relationship (5 red). Five reviews were rated green overall. Twelve (67 %) of the primary studies were rated green, with evidence for strength and temporality.

Conclusions: There is reasonable evidence for a likely causal relationship between sedentary behaviour and all-cause mortality based on the epidemiological criteria of strength of association, consistency of effect, and temporality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart showing identification, screening, and selection of systematic review papers

References

    1. Network SBR. Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”. Applied Physiology, Nutrition & Metabolism. 2012;37:540–2. doi: 10.1139/h2012-024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dempsey PC, Owen N, Biddle SJH, Dunstan DW. Managing sedentary behaviour to reduce the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(9):522. doi: 10.1007/s11892-014-0522-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Television time and continuous metabolic risk in physically active adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(4):639–45. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181607421. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouchard C, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Less sitting, more physical activity, or higher fitness? Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(11):1533–40. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: The population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(3):105–13. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed