Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;23(12):1346-1353.
doi: 10.1111/acem.13045.

Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda

Affiliations

Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda

Edward R Melnick et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Decision aids are evidenced-based tools designed to increase patient understanding of medical options and possible outcomes, facilitate conversation between patients and clinicians, and improve patient engagement. Decision aids have been used for shared decision making (SDM) interventions outside of the ED setting for more than a decade. Their use in the ED has only recently begun to be studied. This article provides background on this topic and the conclusions of the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference SDM in practice work group regarding "Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-Relevant, Patient-Centered Research Agenda." The goal was to determine a prioritized research agenda for the development and testing of SDM interventions for use in emergency care that was most important to patients, clinicians, caregivers, and other key stakeholders. Using the nominal group technique, the consensus working group proposed prioritized research questions in six key domains: 1) content (i.e., clinical scenario or decision area), 2) level of evidence available, 3) tool design strategies, 4) risk communication, 5) stakeholders, and 6) outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

References

    1. Flynn D, Knoedler MA, Hess EP, et al. Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19:959–67. - PubMed
    1. Montori VM, Breslin M, Maleska M, Weymiller AJ. Creating a conversation: insights from the development of a decision aid. PLoS medicine. 2007;4:e233. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014;1:CD001431. - PubMed
    1. Anderson RT, Montori VM, Shah ND, et al. Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials. 2014;15:166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hess EP, Knoedler MA, Shah ND, et al. The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2012;5:251–9. - PubMed

Publication types