Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients
- PMID: 27458209
- PMCID: PMC5038324
- DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00585-16
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of a weight-based cefoxitin dosing regimen for surgical prophylaxis in obese patients. Patients received a single dose of cefoxitin at 40 mg/kg based on total body weight. Cefoxitin samples were obtained over 3 h from serum and adipose tissue, and concentrations were determined by validated high-performance liquid chromatography. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed, followed by Monte Carlo simulations to estimate probability of target attainment (PTA) for Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Bacteroides fragilis over 4-h periods postdose. Thirty patients undergoing bariatric procedures were enrolled. The body mass index (mean ± standard deviation [SD])was 45.9 ± 8.0 kg/m(2) (range, 35.0 to 76.7 kg/m(2)); the median cefoxitin dose was 5 g (range, 4.0 to 7.5 g). The mean maximum concentrations were 216.15 ± 41.80 μg/ml in serum and 12.62 ± 5.89 in tissue; the mean tissue/serum ratio was 8% ± 3%. In serum, weight-based regimens achieved ≥90% PTA (goal time during which free [unbound] drug concentrations exceed pathogen MICs [fT>MIC] of 100%) for E. coli and S. aureus over 2 h and for B. fragilis over 1 h; in tissue this regimen failed to achieve goal PTA at any time point. The 40-mg/kg regimens achieved higher PTAs over longer periods in both serum and tissue than did the standard 2-g doses. However, although weight-based cefoxitin regimens were better than fixed doses, achievement of desired pharmacodynamic targets was suboptimal in both serum and tissue. Alternative dosing regimens and agents should be explored in order to achieve more favorable antibiotic performance during surgical prophylaxis in obese patients.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Similar articles
-
Population pharmacokinetics of prophylactic cefoxitin in elective bariatric surgery patients: a prospective monocentric study.Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024 Jun;43(3):101376. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101376. Epub 2024 Mar 15. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 38494157 Clinical Trial.
-
Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of cefoxitin in obesity: implications for risk of surgical site infection.Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):730-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821fff74. Epub 2011 Jun 3. Anesth Analg. 2011. PMID: 21642605
-
Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem in Nonobese, Obese, and Morbidly Obese Patients.J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Mar;57(3):356-368. doi: 10.1002/jcph.812. Epub 2016 Sep 22. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 27530916
-
Intravenous Antibiotic and Antifungal Agent Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Dosing in Adults with Severe Burn Injury.Clin Ther. 2016 Sep;38(9):2016-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 30. Clin Ther. 2016. PMID: 27586127 Review.
-
Lack of Pharmacokinetic Basis of Weight-Based Dosing and Intra-Operative Re-Dosing with Cefazolin Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese Patients: Implications for Antibiotic Stewardship.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Sep;20(6):439-443. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.039. Epub 2019 May 21. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019. PMID: 31112072 Review.
Cited by
-
Interaction of Cephalosporins with Human Serum Albumin: A Structural Study.J Med Chem. 2024 Aug 22;67(16):14175-14183. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c00983. Epub 2024 Jul 31. J Med Chem. 2024. PMID: 39083648 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacodynamic model for β-lactam regimens used in surgical prophylaxis: model-based evaluation of standard dosing regimens.Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1059-1071. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0720-y. Epub 2018 Aug 16. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018. PMID: 30117081
-
Six Long-Standing Questions about Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery.Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 15;12(5):908. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050908. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37237811 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing intermittent cefoxitin administration versus loading bolus followed by continuous infusion for the prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: the PROPHYLOXITIN study protocol.BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e088306. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088306. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 39880423 Free PMC article.
-
Antibiotic prophylaxis with high-dose cefoxitin in bariatric surgery: an observational prospective single center study.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Sep 9;63(12):e01613-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01613-19. Epub 2019 Oct 7. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019. PMID: 31591127 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nelson RL, Glenny AM, Song F. 2009. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 21:CD001181. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical