Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):5885-93.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00585-16. Print 2016 Oct.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients

Pierre Moine et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of a weight-based cefoxitin dosing regimen for surgical prophylaxis in obese patients. Patients received a single dose of cefoxitin at 40 mg/kg based on total body weight. Cefoxitin samples were obtained over 3 h from serum and adipose tissue, and concentrations were determined by validated high-performance liquid chromatography. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed, followed by Monte Carlo simulations to estimate probability of target attainment (PTA) for Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Bacteroides fragilis over 4-h periods postdose. Thirty patients undergoing bariatric procedures were enrolled. The body mass index (mean ± standard deviation [SD])was 45.9 ± 8.0 kg/m(2) (range, 35.0 to 76.7 kg/m(2)); the median cefoxitin dose was 5 g (range, 4.0 to 7.5 g). The mean maximum concentrations were 216.15 ± 41.80 μg/ml in serum and 12.62 ± 5.89 in tissue; the mean tissue/serum ratio was 8% ± 3%. In serum, weight-based regimens achieved ≥90% PTA (goal time during which free [unbound] drug concentrations exceed pathogen MICs [fT>MIC] of 100%) for E. coli and S. aureus over 2 h and for B. fragilis over 1 h; in tissue this regimen failed to achieve goal PTA at any time point. The 40-mg/kg regimens achieved higher PTAs over longer periods in both serum and tissue than did the standard 2-g doses. However, although weight-based cefoxitin regimens were better than fixed doses, achievement of desired pharmacodynamic targets was suboptimal in both serum and tissue. Alternative dosing regimens and agents should be explored in order to achieve more favorable antibiotic performance during surgical prophylaxis in obese patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ. 1999. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:725–730. doi:10.1086/501572. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guideline Writers Workgroup. 2005. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Am J Surg 189:395–404. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stratchounski LS, Taylor EW, Dellinger EP, Pechere JC. 2005. Antibiotic policies in surgery: a consensus paper. Int J Antimicrob Agents 26:312–322. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.07.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rovera F, Diurni M, Dionigi G, Boni L, Ferrari A, Carcano G, Dionigi R. 2005. Antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 3:787–795. doi:10.1586/14787210.3.5.787. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson RL, Glenny AM, Song F. 2009. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 21:CD001181. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources