Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase
- PMID: 2745880
- DOI: 10.1121/1.397751
Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase
Abstract
Modulation thresholds were measured for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) broadband noise in the presence of a SAM broadband background noise with a modulation depth (mm) of 0.00, 0.25, or 0.50, where the condition mm = 0.00 corresponds to standard (unmasked) modulation detection. The modulation frequency of the masker was 4, 16, or 64 Hz; the modulation frequency of the signal ranged from 2-512 Hz. The greatest amount of modulation masking (masked threshold minus unmasked threshold) typically occurred when the signal frequency was near the masker frequency. The modulation masking patterns (amount of modulation masking versus signal frequency) for the 4-Hz masker were low pass, whereas the patterns for the 16- and 64-Hz maskers were somewhat bandpass (although not strictly so). In general, the greater the modulation depth of the masker, the greater the amount of modulation masking (although this trend was reversed for the 4-Hz masker at high signal frequencies). These modulation-masking data suggest that there are channels in the auditory system which are tuned for the detection of modulation frequency, much like there are channels (critical bands or auditory filters) tuned for the detection of spectral frequency.
Similar articles
-
Binaural modulation masking.J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Mar;89(3):1340-9. doi: 10.1121/1.400657. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991. PMID: 2030221
-
Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration.J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Jan;85(1):273-81. doi: 10.1121/1.397734. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989. PMID: 2921409
-
Failure to obtain comodulation masking release with frequency-modulated maskers.J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Jun;83(6):2290-2. doi: 10.1121/1.396359. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988. PMID: 3411020
-
Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.Hear Res. 2018 Mar;359:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 14. Hear Res. 2018. PMID: 29310976
-
Co-modulation masking release: spectro-temporal pattern analysis in hearing.Br J Audiol. 1990 Apr;24(2):131-7. doi: 10.3109/03005369009077854. Br J Audiol. 1990. PMID: 2190655 Review.
Cited by
-
Interference of mid-level sound statistics underlie human speech recognition sensitivity in natural noise.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Oct 4:2024.02.13.579526. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.13.579526. bioRxiv. 2024. Update in: J Neurosci. 2025 Aug 6;45(32):e1751242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1751-24.2025. PMID: 38405870 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jul;130(1):489-500. doi: 10.1121/1.3592220. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011. PMID: 21786914 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Reduced Spectral Resolution on Temporal-Coherence-Based Source Segregation.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Mar 13:2024.03.11.584489. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.11.584489. bioRxiv. 2024. Update in: J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Dec 1;156(6):3862-3876. doi: 10.1121/10.0034545. PMID: 38586037 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Auditory "bubbles": Efficient classification of the spectrotemporal modulations essential for speech intelligibility.J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Aug;140(2):1072. doi: 10.1121/1.4960544. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016. PMID: 27586738 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic Reweighting of Auditory Modulation Filters.PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jul 11;12(7):e1005019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005019. eCollection 2016 Jul. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016. PMID: 27398600 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources