Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;42 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-4.
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv167.

Dose Equivalents for Antipsychotic Drugs: The DDD Method

Affiliations

Dose Equivalents for Antipsychotic Drugs: The DDD Method

Stefan Leucht et al. Schizophr Bull. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Dose equivalents of antipsychotics are an important but difficult to define concept, because all methods have weaknesses and strongholds.

Methods: We calculated dose equivalents based on defined daily doses (DDDs) presented by the World Health Organisation's Collaborative Center for Drug Statistics Methodology. Doses equivalent to 1mg olanzapine, 1mg risperidone, 1mg haloperidol, and 100mg chlorpromazine were presented and compared with the results of 3 other methods to define dose equivalence (the "minimum effective dose method," the "classical mean dose method," and an international consensus statement).

Results: We presented dose equivalents for 57 first-generation and second-generation antipsychotic drugs, available as oral, parenteral, or depot formulations. Overall, the identified equivalent doses were comparable with those of the other methods, but there were also outliers.

Conclusions: The major strength of this method to define dose response is that DDDs are available for most drugs, including old antipsychotics, that they are based on a variety of sources, and that DDDs are an internationally accepted measure. The major limitations are that the information used to estimate DDDS is likely to differ between the drugs. Moreover, this information is not publicly available, so that it cannot be reviewed. The WHO stresses that DDDs are mainly a standardized measure of drug consumption, and their use as a measure of dose equivalence can therefore be misleading. We, therefore, recommend that if alternative, more "scientific" dose equivalence methods are available for a drug they should be preferred to DDDs. Moreover, our summary can be a useful resource for pharmacovigilance studies.

Keywords: antipsychotic drugs; dosage; equivalency; olanzapine; quetiapine; risperidone; schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Patel MX, Arista IA, Taylor M, Barnes TR. How to compare doses of different antipsychotics: a systematic review of methods. Schizophr Res. 2013;149:141–148. - PubMed
    1. Davis JM. Dose equivalence of the antipsychotic drugs. J Psychiatr Res. 1974;11:65–69. - PubMed
    1. Woods SW. Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:663–667. - PubMed
    1. Methodology WCCfDS. Guidelines for ATC Classification and DDD Assignment 2014. Oslo: World Health Organisation; 2013.[AU:Please provide country name for publisher location for references 4, ]
    1. Uchida H, Suzuki T, Takeuchi H, Arenovich T, Mamo DC. Low dose vs standard dose of antipsychotics for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: meta-analysis [published online ahead of print November 27, 2009]. SchizophrBull. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp149 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances